Skip to main content

Ten Years and Counting: Piporg-L Celebrates a Major Anniversary

Herbert L. Huestis

Herbert L. Huestis is a contributing editor to The Diapason.

Default

Those of us whose careers span a fair number of years can remember discovering the magic of word processors and e-mail as computers arrived on the scene: the Commodore, Amiga and Kaypro, before the days of DOS, the PC Junior, and ubiquitous IBM 8088. We were astonished by this new technology. Computer clubs were the source of rudimentary skills--we brought our "lunchbox" machines, with hundreds of diskettes neatly stored in red mechanic's tool boxes.

There were good souls who helped neophytes master electronic bulletin boards and primitive communications programs that enabled burgeoning electronic mail. Most of us enjoyed bending our minds around these new concepts and in the early '90s the stage was set in the organ world for an electronic pipe organ list.

At the University of Albany, a "list server" was made available by Ben Chi, a systems analyst who, with Dave Kelzenburg and Dave Schutt, created "Piporg-L," one of the first and definitely the longest running pipe organ discussion list. The idea of pipe organ "conversations" caught hold and persisted through thick and thin. This once-fledgling list is now ten years old and going strong! It boasts over 1,000 subscribers and, though this number fluctuates, it gives an immediate indication of how popular the Piporg-L list is. January 15th officially marked its tenth anniversary. I hope the three "list owners" celebrated!

There is a certain recreational quality about these specialty lists, and that characteristic seems to be at the heart of Piporg-L. One can "tune in" on a variety of themes, but it soon becomes clear that the list thrives on variety--lots of it. Topics are as wide ranging as one can imagine. Sometimes emotions rule, and exchanges can get heated. Flames lick at the fabric of the list, and from time to time "owners" have to intervene. It's all pretty exciting, both to those who participate with gusto as well as to those who "lurk" in the shadows.

There are some aspects that I have found endearing, if one may use that term in reference to an Internet list. They are presented here, in no particular order, except as I remember them.

Conferences and conventions

Leading up to an organ event, there is often a scramble among list members to meet and put names and faces together. This is welcome solidarity and makes for easy communication with organists who first meet at a convention.

Research

Questions are often "put" on the list to help solve problems encountered by organ technicians and builders. In my personal experience, the organ list has made the difference between being well informed and learning too little, too late to avoid bitter lessons. All that is required is to put out your S.O.S. message in a clear and concise way, and it will be answered, often with great thoughtfulness.

Time flies when you are having fun

An amazing aspect of the list is the speed with which new organs are discovered and how they may be discussed (and dissected) in the course of a few days. There are no longer secrets in the organ world! The characteristics of a new organ, the room in which it stands, and the players who bring on its first breath of life are recorded for posterity and promulgated by official and unofficial observers and enthusiasts. Concerts and symposia on new organs are no longer events for the media and cognoscenti. They are open forums, attended by live audiences which, through the efforts of list members, disseminate impressions and provide a "bird's-eye view" of pipe organ activities accross the land.

It is said that the Internet has actually failed to accomplish some of the big ticket items that its corporate sponsors hoped to achieve. That it has grown in an independent way, without de facto leaders, does not mean it has grown without leadership. Growth just comes from within. This is a subtle point, but important, that the entity we call the Internet, and all its subsystems, of which Piporg-L is one, are free to evolve according to the input and output of its own members. This is a happy thought as Piporg-L enters its second decade.

Related Content

Keeping Up with the OrganNet Or, "Try Not to Spin Your Wheels in Cyberspace"

by Herbert L. Huestis
Default

It seems like eons have passed since personal computers appeared in our lives--but it has only been a little over a decade since I bought my first grey box with a green phosphor screen--a 1984 Kaypro. It was built like a truck, was a great word processor, made no fan noise, and the cursor did not blink. Unfortunately, this super typewriter was considered obsolete in three years, and I replaced it with a "PC" with a fan so loud I thought it was going to take off. Nowadays, when I acquire a computer, I kill the blinking cursor and fuss with the fan to make it as quiet as the old Kaypro. So much for "keeping up!"

Today, the Internet challenges us as much as those first computers did. Kenneth Matthews writes to Piporg-L from San Francisco:

All right. If someone will explain to me, I promise to pay attention this time. I can't figure out (or remember) where Osiris actually is . . .

--Kenneth (spinning my wheels in cyberspace) Matthews

Ken's problem is not unique on the Internet. There are thousands of offerings, but you have to know where to find them. The Osiris Archive is no exception. Ken is trying to keep up, too.

There is so much activity on the OrganNet (Piporg-L) that most "cyber-organists" are panting to keep pace. Piporg-L started with 40 subscribers and has since passed the 600 mark. I long resisted Windows software, thinking I could avoid clicking on icons in favor of the ten commandments of DOS. Finally, I gave in so I could "surf the net" when Piporg-L joined the World Wide Web with their own "web page." This "hypertext" presentation of Piporg-L includes a link to the Osiris Archive as well.

What does all this mean?   Well, it means that you can load "Mosaic" or "Netscape," set your sights on http://albany.edu/~piporg-l or http://osiris.wu-wien.ac.at/ftp/pub/earlym-l/organs

and a page will appear on your computer screen to guide you through the OrganNet (Piporg-L) or The Osiris Archive.

From these "web pages" you can investigate a variety of organ topics from the Organs of Glasgow, to over six hundred specifications in the Osiris Archive. This is a big jump from just a few years ago, when this whole business was just getting started.

Here in a nutshell, are a few corners of cyberspace that organists can enjoy:

Piporg-L: Pipe organs and related topics

http://albany.edu/~piporg-l

The Piporg-L web page will introduce you the contents of the list, starting with a quick guide to searching the archives, biography files, the Osiris Archive, and recordings of organ music in the CD-Connection catalog.

Osiris Archive

http://osiris.wu-wien.ac.at/ftp/pub/earlym-l/organs/

The Osiris Archive web page describes how to search for over 600 organ specifications in the Osiris database. It lists help files that answer the most frequently asked questions about the archive--how to search for files, upload and downloadspecifications and how to volunteer to type new specifications for the archive. Last but not least, it provides a link to The Diapason Index --some 14,000 entries from the annual reviews that are published each year.

The Osiris Archive is growing daily with submissions from all over the world. The archive is located at the Vienna University of Economics and is part of the Earlym-L archives (a sister list to Piporg-L).  As hoped, it contains not only organ specifications, but playing impressions, recording discography and builders' notes. This material is kept in a free form database and is listed by organ builder, site, city, country and date of construction.

The Diapason Index

http://osiris.wu-wien.ac.at/ftp/pub/earlym-l/organs/diapason.index

The Diapason Index may now be searched online from the Osiris Archive web page, or may be downloaded into your own word processor. These files are "comma delimited text files" and may be imported into your favorite database program, such as Dbase or FoxPro.  Downloading the file takes a bit of time --usually about 20 minutes if you have a fast modem.

Organ CDs

http://albany.edu/~piporg-l/organcds.@cd-conn

This spring, Ben Chi, co-owner of Piporg-L, posted an announcement that he had downloaded the organ catalog of The CD Connection, a well known catalog order firm. He culled out some 1,500 organ CDs and saved them on Piporg-L. To download this CD list by email, send this message to

[email protected]:

get organcds.@cd-conn

Be prepared for a moderate length download. This is a 27 page text file. Once you have loaded this file into your word processor, you may search for title, composer and artist, using your own word processor's "search" command. Prices of the organ CDs in this catalog are reported to be very competitive.

The OrganNet Today: A Tangled World-Wide-Web We Weave

by Herbert L. Huestis
Default

The organ world of the Internet is indeed awash in web pages--a tangled mass of advertising with each "www.com" page clamoring for the "net-surfer's" attention. Some are merely informative sites, while the greatest share are "home pages" of organ builders and technicians. No one wants to be left out of the world wide web--there are books in every drug store promoting the benefits of advertising on the Internet. Someone behind every new web page is hoping for a bit of the largess that is promised by the purveyors of a new form of drug store novel: How to Succeed on the Web! What was once a vehicle for research and information is looking more and more like a topsy-turvy "yellow pages."

That being said, the situation will surely get worse before it gets better. Here and there one finds various sites that guide the earnest user amongst and between the "billboards," so they can find topics of real interest. The first bit of advice to organists who want to let their "fingers do the walking" on the Internet is to start with major "links" in the organ world, rather than trying to sort out the thousands of entries that are listed on the "search engines" like Webcrawler, Lycos, Yahoo, InfoSeek and Alta Vista.

Some links are found right where you would expect them--for example, The American Guild of Organists at http://www.agohq.org and the Royal College of Canadian Organists at http://www.capitalnet.com/~rjewell/rcco.html. Many fine offerings may be found at "Pipe Organs and Related Topics" at http://uacsc2.albany.edu/~piporg-l and of course, The Diapason at http://www.sgcpubs.com/thediapason.html and The Osiris Archive at http://osiris.wu-wien.ac.at/earlym-l/organs.

A most unexpected listing of pipe organ subjects appears under the "Nerdworld" banner at http://www.nerdworld.com.nw8061.html. Here the reader will find the American Pipe Organ Builders Association pages, resource pages for finding recordings of pipe organ related compact disks, and the usual organ builders' home pages!

Enough of internet jargon--perhaps it is useful to highlight typical people and places that serve as tour guides to this electronic malaise of competing "addresses." There are a few personalities who have emerged as leaders in "OrganNet" happenings. Here they are:

Ben Chi and Piporg-L

http://uacsc2.albany.edu/~piporg-l

The Piporg-L list remains as the most successful email gathering place for organ enthusiasts. The links presented here are logical and well organized. An evening spent perusing information and organizations here will be rewarding indeed.

Steve Fox and The Seattle Pipe Organ Scene

This is a fine example of "area" tours that are available on the net. Similar examples may be found all over the world. Armchair travelogues abound, and thanks to the web, world-wide commuters can plan the itinerary of any trip around organs of a geographical area. Steve can be found at http://www.eskimo.com/~sfox/seaorgan.htm.

Maureen Jais-Mick and AGO online

Ongoing columns in The American Organist serve as an excellent guide to OrganNet surfers. Its not a bad idea to clip out these columns and keep a little notebook of worthy places. Look for Maureen at http://www.agohq.org/-tao/agonline.html

Ross Jewell and Christopher Dawes of the RCCO

These two gentlemen are the "communications" department of the RCCO and their guide to the net is very focused and well organized.

Nerdworld

Nerdworld links are available in an extensive number of subject areas and topics of interest. This straightforward listing tends to highlight important organizations and associations and picks up important links that are hard to find elsewhere.

Here are a few tips to help unravel the morass of information you will encounter in a typical jaunt on the Internet.

Bookmark your interesting links

All internet software has long provided a means to "bookmark" points of interest found in an evening's surfing. That little mouse button called "add bookmark" can be extremely handy if you want to return to the scene of the crime to gather a bit more information later.

Saving documents

"Control-S" usually saves the document you are scanning directly to your computer. It's a sort of "quick ftp" meaning "file transfer protocol." That means you can almost effortlessly gather complete web pages and organ tours by "copying the file," or "saving as . . . "

Open a simultaneous word processor while you are "surfing"

It can be most helpful to open a word processor in your computer before you open your web browser. This means that if you come across an interesting address or site location, you can "copy" a bit of the screen text you encounter for future reference.

Keep a "link" notebook

This is the usual enjoinder to "organize your thoughts." It seems that "surfing" on the net suggests that the computer user is mindlessly floating from one bit of information to another, when in fact, we know that the human brain does not actually have to operate that way. Many folks are natural organizers in many aspects of their life, and once they sit in front of their computer, they have the option managing their time there, just they do in other aspects of their work and leisure. It's odd that people who would not take a motor trip without a planned itinerary will park themselves in front of the computer screen and mindlessly click the mouse without thinking "where am I going and what am I doing?"

Take heart. You can plan your computer commute the same way you plan other activities. As they say, "Just do it!" If you take the time to write down your preludes and postludes and choral anthem of the week--you can make a few notes of the sites you want to visit--that way you can reduce your computer time a bit, so that you don't raise the dander of the "computer widow (or widower)" in the other room. Bon Voyage!

OrganNet Report

by Herbert L. Huestis
Default

AGO.DOT.COM

A Tale of Two Organs

\x\dotcom

 

One aspect of the first AGO national convention of the new millennium was that critical reaction to new organs was instantaneous since "all points" bulletins were sent from laptop computers to the ends of the earth within hours of each event. Each program of the convention was a done deal two hours after its conclusion. There is no retreat from this form of instant replay.

This must be a rather frightening development for organ builders who whose instruments are showcased at a convention--after all, they want to satisfy their clients. Mistakes are hard to forgive when they are so well well advertised!

An excellent case in point was the first recital of the Seattle convention, that of Guy Bovet on the barely finished C.B. Fisk organ at Benaroya Hall, the home of the Seattle Symphony. This organ contains an unusually large supply of monumental stops for a tracker organ of North German lineage, including a "Stentor" division on very high wind pressure. Somehow, Bovet deemed the inclusion of these Promethean stops appropriate for a performance of Bach's E-flat Prelude and Fugue. If there had been wallpaper on the walls of the newly completed symphony hall, it would have curled from the sheer force of sound. Numerous listeners complained of headaches, and despite the lack of a sound meter, it seemed as if, somehow, someone was breaking the law.

A full report of this and other concerts will be provided in the October issue of The Diapason, but within the context of an OrganNet column, what is truly amazing is the speed at which various sources reported on Bovet's performance and the nature of the organ and acoustics of the hall.

This fateful performance was given the evening of July 2. That very evening, the following comment was made on Piporg-l, the Internet pipe organ list.

Dear List:

Seattle Post-Intelligencer critic R.M. Campbell has a piece on the paper's web site commenting on Benaroya Hall's Watjen Concert Organ which receives its public opening this weekend. It can be found at http://seattlep-i.com

The classical section of the Seattle Post-Intelligence web page contains four reviews of the Fisk organ by R.M. Campbell, music critic. They are thoughtful, balanced and well informed on matters organological. Rare stuff for the average music critic. We'll risk a short quote:

However, from my seat in Row N on the main floor, the instrument sounded shrill and too bright in the treble as it moved into forte and beyond. This is an unpleasant sound, with no warmth and little resonance.

These thoughts were echoed by various commentators on Piporg-l:

. . . Benaroya Hall is a big space though not a flattering one, and the Fisk is voiced typically big. (Some people I talked to found it disastrously dead. I know dead, and this isn't it, but as the saying goes it is more visually than acoustically spacious.) The organ definitely can be heard in the hall;

. . . The first Alain Fantaisie was something of a horror from where I sat, and more so for people sitting at higher levels who were nailed by typically maximum-voiced principals and mixtures.

. . . It is unfortunate that such a new building is built with faulty acoustics, especially with so many experts on the loose.

. . . It is not fair to place all the blame on the acoustics of the building (re: shrill treble). Clearly the finishers could have brought down the treble to match the acoustic environment at least to some extent. It does not take a rocket scientist to tell us that a dry room brings out the high frequencies. If Fisk came back in they could probably do something to improve the situation.

Well, it does appear that the Fisk people did come back. In a subsequent review, posted on the Seattle Post-Intelligencer web site, R.M. Campbell comments:

With more than 2,000 of those coming and going through Benaroya's doors for the American Guild of Organists convention--drawn here by the Fisk organ and other notable new instruments such as the Rosales organ at St. James Cathedral--the stakes of judgment become even higher. Organists are rarely short of opinions.

My e-mail from professional musicians, after my reviews of the first two concerts, was remarkably high in quantity and pungent in criticism of the Fisk organ itself.

Certainly, the instrument, which the Seattle Symphony Orchestra is calling the Watjen organ after Craig and Joan Watjen who donated the funds for its commission, has not been a complete success. The major complaint has been that its sound, particularly from the main floor, turns unpleasantly shrill and loud in the upper register. Technicians from the Fisk company have been hard at work this week, symphony officials said, making further adjustments to an instrument situated in a hall acoustically unfriendly to organs in general.

In the front row of the Founders' Tier, I knew I had the best seat for the organ. From there, it sounded balanced, clearly focused, rich in interesting colors and not so given to blasts of brash sound.

It appears that the Fisk voicers were hard at work ameliorating the forced tone that became so apparent when the hall was full. Perhaps they realized that the room (and not the orchestra) was the enemy.

The sharp (and probably justified) criticism of this organ certainly illustrates how high the stakes have become in this era of multi-million dollar organs and the global village, especially when these inaugural concerts are timed to coincide with a national AGO convention.

There was another side to this coin, where the "dot.com" fluidity and speed of communication allowed another organ builder bask in the heady limelight of extremely favorable criticism. However one must immediately caution that, in this case, the acoustical environment for this organ is superb, and most organists know that the room is the most important stop on the organ. The second organ to make its debut at the AGO convention is the new Rosales instrument built for St. James Cathedral, only a few blocks away from Benaroya Hall, but separated by light years in the mystical qualities an organ can invoke, when it finds itself in room that inspires wonder and awe.

Here again, the Pipe Organ List carried immediate reviews and comments.

. . . If Sunday night was a case of unmet high expectations, Monday started with surprise and delight. Some 25 years ago I lived in Seattle, and I remember the 1907 west end Hutchings-Votey of St. James Cathedral (RC) as a wheezy instrument in a dreary room. Well, it's not 1975 any more. The 4/51 organ has received some attention, the building has been stripped of its carpeting and acoustic tiles, and it now sings. Also, there is now a 3/48 Rosales in the chancel with a 4-manual console from which both instruments can be played. And played they were!

. . . The organ and the organist were both brilliant. I've long been a fan of Kynaston and yesterday reconfirmed my fondness for his playing. The organ is wonderful and is a masterpiece. The use of the old H-V organ in the other end of the cathedral was used to great effect. It was a masterful program. I think I heard people weeping after the Karg-Elert because it was so beautiful (there were people weeping after Bovet's Karg-Elert, too, but for a different reason).

I would expect that Manuel Rosales, organbuilder, Nicholas Kynasten, organist, Fr. Michael Ryan, pastor of St. James Cathedral, Stephen Dieck, president of C.B. Fisk, Guy Bovet, organist, Carole Terry, curator of the Banaroya organ, and Charles Harris, architect of Benaroya Hall, will go their separate ways after a week of to and fro criticism from some 1500 organists gathered in Seattle and immensely magnified by the speed and power of the internet in this global village. There is no time to gather one's wits when things go very wrong or very well indeed. Dot.com communication gives a whole new dimension to artists and their work.     n

 

Note:

Quotes from Piporg-l (The Organ List) are verbatim and are not individually referenced.  Sources may be found by searching the Piporg-l archives at

www.albany.edu/piporg-l/

The first option on the Piporg-l web page will be

"Piporg-l list services and archives"

Click on that option and a screen will appear with the words

"Search the archives"

(http://listserv.albany.edu/archives/piporg-l.html)

This is a typical search engine where you can submit keywords to retrieve messages of interest to you. To retrieve the quotes listed in this OrganNet report (and more) you may enter: Seattle; Fisk. That's all you have to do.

Is the Pipe Organ A Stepchild in Academe?

by R. E. Coleberd

R. E. Coleberd is an economist and petroleum industry executive.

Default

Pipe organs advertised for sale by colleges and universities raise serious questions about the vitality of the King of Instruments in institutions of higher learning.  Organs that are abandoned or replaced are routinely advertised in the classified columns of The Diapason and The American Organist, an economical and efficient way of reaching potential buyers. However, until now, solicitations by schools have clearly been the exception.

In discussions with active and retired organ faculty and
music department personnel across the country, the author has discovered what
he finds to be a disturbing nationwide phenomenon symptomatic of a paradoxical
trend in higher education.  The
advertised sales seem to be the tip of an iceberg. Many organs, having too
often been systematically neglected and abandoned, are now being sold off at an
increasing rate. The experiences of the schools cited below, together with
comments by faculty who, all too often, have watched the sad spectacle of the
pipe organ fading into the sunset, demonstrate that we are witnessing a crisis
with profound implications for cultural life in America.

The purpose of this paper is to create awareness of the
gravity of the situation. We will analyze causes of the phenomenon and give
examples to illustrate the scope of the problem in both auditorium, concert
hall, practice and studio instruments. The reader will, no doubt, be aware of
similar examples elsewhere. Each one differs but there are common threads
through all of them.  We will offer
recommendations on how persons who are deeply distressed by these ominous
developments--because their lives are so closely connected to the instrument:  faculty, students, alumni and concerned laymen--can protect and promote the pipe organ in an academic setting. In retrospect, we believe the S.O.S. should have been tapped out thirty years ago.

Background

We begin with the premise that a pipe organ on a college
campus is an integral part of the intellectual, cultural, artistic and musical
resources of the school, standing alongside the telescope in the observatory,
the paintings and sculpture in the art gallery and the book collections in the
library. These time-honored treasures of a campus setting constitute the raison
d'être of institutions of higher learning, traditionally the trustees of
our culture and the guardians of our future in science and the arts. They make
possible its mission and accomplishments, and define its status and recognition
among its peers.

We continue with the admonition that a pipe organ is
symbolic of the achievements of western civilization and the legacy of our
European origins. It embodies the collective experience of generations in its
recognized prominence in the creativity and expression of music as well as in
architecture, technical developments and craftsmanship. Without the King of
Instruments, the great music it made possible would not have been written, and
without this rich tradition the instrument would not have enjoyed its glorious
position in history. The pipe organ embraced the finest craftsmanship in
Europe, just as precision workmanship survives in organbuilding today, symbolic
of the artistry of hand-crafted objects. In technical strides, the instrument
was the equal of any developments in the 19th and early 20th centuries. At the
turn of this century, the pipe organ was perhaps the most complex mechanism
ever developed. The combination action and other features of the console,
particularly the unrivaled Austin combination action, were an example of binary
algebra and an immediate predecessor of the computer. The Skinner player
mechanism on residence organs employed a pneumatic/mechanical computer to
decipher the rolls; in retrospect a further development of Charles Babbage's
difference engine dating back to the 1820s.1

Therefore, a pipe organ is not merely an appliance or
teaching device. Its value and contribution, along with other cornerstones of a
campus setting, are in the perpetuation of an atmosphere of excellence in
learning and human aspirations in culture and the arts. Sadly, these timeless
elements have gone largely unnoticed today by college administrators and state
legislatures who fail to recognize the stature of the instrument in their
budgetary deliberations and who base their decisions on square feet of space
required, number of credit hours generated and dollars of support necessary.

The fate of the instrument and the crux of the problem is,
in many ways, a manifestation of the unique characteristics of the pipe organ
which set it apart from other campus resources. The pipe organ in an
institutional setting suffers from a spatial, temporal and what some might call
an existential problem. In comparison with other musical instruments it is
quite large, requires considerable space, is fixed in location and, therefore,
its musical delivery is confined to the proximity of the instrument. In
contrast, violinists and pianists perform in a variety of venues the world over
thereby fostering a close symbiotic relationship between themselves, their
music and the instrument. Moreover, as Will Headlee points out, because of the
nuances and complexities of the pipe organ, requiring a close interaction with
the performer, music making on the organ is akin to chamber music which
necessitates a chamber music mentality versus a soloist mentality.2
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
The linkage between organists and the
instrument is not so close in part because they play many different
instruments. The problem is exacerbated when the music-going public think of
themselves as deciding first to go to hear an organ, and second, to hear a
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
particular organist.
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
Sadly, they don't go very often.
Furthermore, those interested in organ music per se have available compact
discs of the world's great instruments, and in the course of listening to them
they become less interested--and less supportive--of instruments of lower
quality and reputation.

The pipe organ is no longer a priority item with music
school deans and department chair persons, who must compete for students and
who struggle to maintain their share of a diminishing campus budget in an
atmosphere of financially strapped institutions. Tragically, pipe organs are
too often considered expendable. As Western Washington's Albert Smith explains:  in contrast to other musical instruments, a pipe organ is a "terribly expensive musical medium to purchase and maintain."3 In physical and dollar terms it is rather like
comparing an ocean liner to a rowboat. 
A violin may require a new string or two, an oboe a reed.
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
But Smith doesn't have funds in his
budget for a routine service call.

The instrument is also the victim of the pronounced secular
trend in policy decisions in the upper echelons of university administration.
In all but the few remaining traditional church-related liberal arts colleges
which enjoy a very close and continuing denominational affiliation, religious
beliefs are intellectually suspect in the quest for "truth" and
perhaps nothing is more "politically incorrect" on campus today than
organized religion. Religious faith and corporate worship are sometimes viewed
as a sign of personal weakness and dependency. Perhaps because the pipe organ
is so closely tied to the church in the layman's mind, it is perceived as an
antique or museum piece and is, therefore, irrelevant to the pursuit of
knowledge in our time, particularly in the frantic search for "hot
buttons" such as computer science and genetic engineering to generate
publicity and garner public and private financial support.

The declining fortunes of the pipe organ in academe are
also, without doubt, a reflection of the waning interest in high culture in the
baby boom generation. The prior generation, the war babies, were deeply
involved in cultural pursuits, as measured by attendance and financial support.
But their offspring, as surveys show, are two-career families who are often
pre-occupied with television, movies and pop culture, and who frequently spend
their limited time working out at the health club or surfing on the Internet.
Baby boomers' education levels, though higher than their parents, differed
significantly:  fewer chose liberal
arts degrees with the corresponding affinity for the arts; more chose business
and engineering. Judith Balfe, author of a forthcoming study comments:
"For their parents' generation, those who had higher education and higher
income, the arts were far more important to their understanding of themselves
and their civic responsibility." Today, audiences are segmented and
targeted by advertisers, and "the sense of a culture--at least a popular
culture--which transcended generations" is gone.4

In the economic and political exigencies of state
legislatures and often their private school counterparts as well, cost-benefit
analysis has emerged, in this era, as the overriding criterion for the
allocation of funds in higher education. Under these mandates, the pipe organ
is acutely vulnerable to changing patterns of student enrollment and facilities
use. One conspicuous development in this trend is the designation of professional schools as "stand alone" enterprises (the law school at the University of Virginia and the business school at Duke University are examples) with sole responsibility for their financial well-being. Presumably they can be funded adequately by tuition, alumni giving, endowments and continuing education fees, all a manifestation of the economic fortunes of these
professions in our society. In contrast, these sources of support are decidedly
limited for the arts.  It is
difficult to imagine that the income of a church musician would ever endow a
pipe organ let alone a music department or school.

We must emphasize that there are decided limits to the
market-driven mentality which so pervades our colleges today. An institution of
higher learning is not a consumer products business, like detergents or
toothpaste, in which products (curriculum) are changed to suit every whim of a
fickle public. It is not a middle eastern bazaar in which the travelers
(students) shop in passing for rugs and brass (courses). If a college or
university "sells out" to the marketplace and surrenders every
vestige of intellectual rigor and vitality, it risks becoming a trade school.
Over time, the application of cost-benefit analysis in the funding of state
supported schools erodes the distinction of an institution of higher learning
from any other state agency (prison, mental hospital, orphanage, etc.). The
resulting minimum level of funding substantially diminishes its unique and
time-honored function.  Can an
academic institution, let alone a pipe organ, survive in such an atmosphere?
The well-known social critic Thorstein Veblen  in his polemic The Higher Learning in America: A
Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Men

style='font-style:normal'>, identified what we now term the market mentality;
the prevailing emphasis on "practical or useful" curricula as
measured by the payoff in the job market. If Veblen's acid critique was
premature in 1918, it couldn't have been more prophetic of the sad situation today.5

Auditoriums and Concert Halls

In the earlier decades of this century, the college
auditorium was customarily a focal point of the campus landscape, and often an
architectural masterpiece.  As a
convocation center it symbolized the collegial atmosphere of the institution.
No auditorium was complete without a large pipe organ, often a superb
instrument by a renowned builder such as George Hutchings or E. M. Skinner.
This was also a period in which the university organist enjoyed high visibility
and a prominent position in the faculty hierarchy beyond his appointment in the
music department, in part because, frequently, he had studied in Europe, a mark
of distinction and status in the professoriate of that era. Presiding at the
auditorium console, his heroic and inspiring music welcomed student and faculty
gatherings for convocations, and he accompanied the singing of the national
anthem and the alma mater. He played the processional and recessional for
commencement, and accompanied the glee club. The auditorium and the pipe organ
thus served as a unifying force in the undergraduate experience, contributing
to that vital sense of community, identity and the search for meaning so
tragically lacking in many schools today. No more! In our time campus speakers
are specialized and appeal only to certain disciplines and departments. Schools
have become too large for campus-wide convocations, and commencement has been
moved to the football field to accommodate the crowd. Moreover, in the
politicized atmosphere of a college campus today, there is too often no common
culture or purpose, no collective embrace of the universal values of an
institution of higher learning. Instead, each self-serving school or department
has become "privatized," looking out for its own interests and
grasping aggressively for its share of the diminishing public and private
funding. Whereas in earlier times the pipe organ was an integral part of the
auditorium and its function, now the instrument is too often underutilized and
dismissed as redundant. In the current use of the building it is merely in the
way, something to be ignored or cast aside.

The rebirth of the tracker organ in the 1950s, first with
widely-publicized European imports, and then with instruments by small domestic
builders, polarized the academic community and called into question the
efficacy of the American classic organ and its romantic and orchestral
ancestors. Music departments philosophically and functionally moved toward
earlier instruments, including the harpsichord. Large auditorium organs were
suddenly deemed out of date and expendable. This was also a time when budgets
allowed for obsolescence and replacement. But not today! Gone are the times
when instruments could be changed every generation in compliance with
nationwide fads and fashions, or to suit the demands of the teaching profession
who argued that a tracker instrument was necessary to attract students and who
were most likely expressing their desire to emulate their peers. Not that
obtaining a tracker was any assurance of protecting the status of the organ in
the school. True, they are smaller and require less space. But because of the
fundamental connection of the organ with church music, there is still the risk
of its being alienated by the deeply entrenched secular outlook on campus.

James Madison University

James Madison University, named for our fourth president, is
a school of 12,500 students in Harrisonburg, Virginia, southwest of Washington,
D.C. In 1937, the then Madison College, one of three teachers' colleges or
"normal schools" in the state, installed a landmark four-manual
fifty-two rank Möller pipe organ in Wilson Hall, scaled and voiced by the
legendary Richard O. Whitelegg. 
According to the late John Hose, Möller tonal director, this
instrument was one of the first four-manual Whitelegg Mollers.6 The dedicatory
recital was played by the nationally known keyboard artist Charlotte
Lockwood.  In a Möller
advertisement in the January, 1937 edition of The American Organist, the
builder stated that the instrument ". . . has already been adjudged as
definitely outstanding among the best organs in the East."7 This
pronouncement was validated by Senator Emerson Richards, who, reviewing the
instrument in the September edition of the same journal added: "Organ history has begun a new chapter and M. P. Möller Inc. is to be congratulated upon having written one of the first verses."8 Apart from its place in the resources of the university,  this instrument is an important milestone in the organ reform movement, and in the history of the Möller Company, for decades one of the premier companies in the American organ industry and now defunct. It is a signature instrument in the career of Whitelegg, an important figure in the twentieth-century legacy of the pipe organ in America. Yet tragically, these factors were overlooked when Wilson Hall was renovated in 1986. The stage was extended to accommodate a variety of venues, but no thought was given to the future of the organ. During remodeling the console was disconnected and stored in an unheated construction trailer which turned out to be its death sentence. As is well-known among organbuilders, a console stored under such conditions will deteriorate; in this case, it disintegrated. A local newspaper story soliciting community support to restore or replace the console of the now-forgotten organ fell on deaf ears. The university administration has made it known that campus investments in the arts will, at the present time, most likely depend upon private funding. In locked chambers today,  this majestic instrument stands mute, perhaps never to speak again.

The events at James Madison illustrate another common
problem in the academic fortunes of the pipe organ:  the conflict between the music and drama departments in
multi-purpose facilities. In 1968, the university built a fine arts center and
installed a three-manual Möller organ, a welcome sign that the
administration recognized music and the place of the organ in its concept of
the arts. However, as a result of poor space planning and failure to anticipate
overlap in facilities use, the music department soon tangled with the drama
department for use of the performance area. In due course, the music department
lost the turf battle and the Möller organ was taken out and sold to a
church in Ohio. A large four-story building to house the music department was
built in 1989, but budget limitations prevented the inclusion of a recital
hall, which precluded the addition of a pipe organ as an integral and visible
part of the resources of the facility. The only hint of a pipe organ on campus
today is the two practice instruments in the music building. The faculty uses
five instruments in town churches for teaching and student performances.

New England Conservatory

The sad situation in Jordan Hall at the New England
Conservatory of Music in Boston, is the result of discontinuities, conflicts
and budget priorities, beginning in many cases several decades ago, which are
seemingly endemic to the fate of concert hall instruments today. Built in 1902,
Jordan Hall featured a three-manual Hutchings organ which was a notable
addition to the cultural and musical resources of the city. It symbolized, no
doubt,  the importance of organ
study in the musical philosophy and mission of the Conservatory, as well as the
significance of a recital and instructional instrument in a concert hall.

Rebuilt and enlarged by Ernest M. Skinner in 1920, this
renowned instrument was widely used and well maintained, with a new console in
1928 and further work by Aeolian-Skinner in 1947. As tastes changed in the
1950s, the organ fell out of fashion and other demands for the hall took
precedence. In 1957, its status was seriously diminished when George Faxon, an
icon figure in the New England organ fraternity, left the Conservatory. His
successor, Donald Willing, ordered two European trackers (Metzler and Rieger)
to define the "new look" in pipe organs for the school. By the
mid-1960s, the Jordan Hall organ was passé and neglected; ten years
later it was was unplayable. In 1995, in an all too familiar policy decision,
the instrument was omitted from a $12 million renovation of Jordan Hall on the
grounds of expense and limited use--the busy hall schedule allows no time for
organ students.  One wonders if it
is only a matter of time until the instrument is sold. When an organ is both
unplayable and inaccessible, the chances of its survival are slim indeed.

University of South Dakota

At the University of South Dakota in Vermillion, the
twenty-eight rank, four-manual E. M. Skinner organ of 1928 was put in the dock
two years ago, a victim of deteriorating leather and wind leaks. The school
administration, under pressure to conform to enrollment and credit hours as the
overriding criteria for budgeting, and answering the call of the state
legislature to cut expenses, is uninterested in restoring the instrument. This
experience, common in publicly supported institutions, illustrates the fact
that there are seemingly no appropriations for maintenance, a situation which
is especially devastating for the pipe organ which requires scheduled routine
maintenance, as well as major expenses in the periodic renewal of chest
leather, and today in an electrical upgrade of the console. Today the "Why
do we need it?" reasoning asserts itself as well as the "Look what we
can do with the $100,000 (or more) required when only a few students play it
and hardly anybody listens to it."!

Western Washington University

The 1200-seat auditorium at Western Washington University in
Bellingham, houses a 1951 three-manual Möller organ, which fell into
disrepair and has been unplayable for twenty years. Campus politics have
dictated that the auditorium be used primarily for drama productions. Albert
Shaw, former music department chairman, estimates it would require $100,000 to
restore the instrument to its original condition, an outsized figure as
maintenance budgets go and a sum virtually impossible to justify given the
primary use of the building.

In 1978 Western Washington constructed a 700-seat concert
hall and installed a two- manual tracker instrument to complement three
practice organs. Then, in a familiar story, the theory professor who taught the
handful of organ students retired and was not replaced. Organ instruction was
then terminated only to be resumed after three years and then discontinued
again. Because a service call from Canada, two days at a minimum of $350-$500,
is prohibitive under current department budgets, neither the concert hall
tracker nor the three practice organs are maintained on a regular basis.

The University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis, formerly Indiana Central
College, a United Methodist affiliated school, is yet another example of how
changing priorities and the economics of space use impact the fortunes of an
auditorium organ. It also illustrates the decision to consign the organs on
campus arbitrarily to a music facility and view them primarily as a teaching
and performance vehicle in a specialized and exclusive curriculum.

The recently-sold three-manual Möller organ was
installed in 1963 when the auditorium was used for convocations and chapel
services, campus-wide functions that were discontinued years ago. With the
auditorium now assigned to the drama department, the instrument was deemed
redundant and expendable.  The
possibility of enlarging and relocating the Möller was briefly considered
some years ago, but  the idea ended
when a new Fine Arts Center was built with a 500-seat recital hall to house a
new tracker instrument yet to be installed.

The evidence to date at James Madison University, the
University of South Dakota, the New England Conservatory, Western Washington
University, The University of Indianapolis and perhaps countless others,
strongly suggests that unless determined action is taken, auditorium pipe
organs may be doomed, especially if the building is the only performance
facility on campus.

The provision of a separate "Jewel Box" recital
hall for the pipe organ, as for example at the universities of Arizona and
Iowa, is viewed by some observers as a mixed blessing. On one hand, it would
appear to guarantee a permanent position for the instrument, insulating it from
the competition for space elsewhere in the building. On the other hand,
removing the organ from the mainstream of the music department, as well as the
rest of the campus, threatens to isolate it and erode the much-needed support
of the university community.

The greater use of off-campus organ resources by music
departments is an emerging trend that is viewed positively in certain quarters
of the teaching profession. At the University of Washington, Carole Terry
considers contractual arrangements with Seattle churches to be one of the
strengths of her program. These instruments, of various periods and tonal
design, complement the Paul Fritz tracker on campus, and afford the students a
much broader orientation to the pipe organ and to the spectrum and
interpretation of its literature. They also offer attractive teaching and
performance opportunities. 

This is the position of Frostburg State University in
Maryland which recently sold a 1970 Tellers organ, an instrument that had
suffered from a poor location and whose installation had never been
satisfactorily completed due to budget limitations. The faculty have long used
two excellent and recently updated Möller organs in Cumberland, within
walking distance of the campus, for teaching and performances. That this is
viewed as a permanent solution to the organ resource needs of the school is
reflected in the fact that the recital hall in the recently completed
multi-million dollar fine arts center omitted any space provision for a pipe
organ. A small, five-rank portable organ, to be used largely for accompaniment,
will be the only hint of a pipe organ on campus.

Arrangements between schools and local churches bodes well
for the pipe organ by reinforcing the linkage between the instrument and its
music in a liturgical setting. Yet it also suggests a lack of commitment to the
organ program in resource and curricular decisions of the school and a tragic
neglect of organ music as a foundation for a high quality education in music.
In the tenor of this paper, it ignores the place of a pipe organ in the broader
cultural dimensions of an institution of higher learning. A small portable
instrument to accompany other music offerings is indicative of a very minor and
largely supportive role for the instrument.  The absence of a recital instrument in a prominent campus
gathering place ignores the time-honored place of the pipe organ in the visible
(and in this case articulate) jewels of a college or university.

Practice and Studio Instruments

The sale of practice and studio organs by Concordia
(Nebraska), Cornell University, Frostburg State (Maryland), Kent State (Ohio),
Stevens Point (Wisconsin), Syracuse, and UCLA among others, with more to come
no doubt, is the final phase in the lockstep sequence of events that marks the
diminishing fortunes of the pipe organ in academe. Step one, declining
enrollment, began with economic forces impacting the organist profession in the
1970s. Wolfgang Rübsam of Northwestern University explains:
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
"When it became generally known
that the poorly paid church organist market would no longer justify parental
tuition investment in an organ education, organ enrollment collapsed."9
This was especially true if the degree was to be financed by loans which could
never be repaid on a church organist's salary. Graduate degrees, frequently at
comparatively costly yet highly visible and quality private schools or conservatories, were likewise unattractive because the academic market had dried up.

Step two was idle instruments, and the emerging
"opportunity costs" of the space which clamored for other use.
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
Step three was to sell the instruments.
To appease penurious state legislatures, campus budget officers liquidated the
under utilized resources and converted the space to a current "hot
button" at the school, perhaps a computer lab.  With budget officials breathing down their necks, the music
department meekly acceded to the cuts, hoping to save what they could in a
campus-wide scramble for funds. Step four is to not replace the organ professor
when he retires (Corliss Arnold at Michigan State and Will Headlee at Syracuse
are examples). The final step in this sad progression is the
"outsourcing" of organ instruction; i.e, to contract with a local
organist to teach the few students on a per diem basis with no benefits.

Concordia College

Concordia College in Seward, Nebraska is one of numerous
Concordia schools in the Lutheran denomination, whose traditional purpose was
to train teachers for their parochial schools. The school master or his
associates were also expected to be the parish musician, a tradition dating
back to colonial times; for example, with Gottlieb Mittelberger in the 1750s in
Pennsylvania.10 The teaching-and-parish-musician position reflected, no doubt,
the influence of Henry Melchior Muhlenberg, founder of Lutheranism in America
and an ardent champion of the pipe organ.11 Every student at Concordia was
automatically enrolled in organ lessons, which necessitated fifteen
instruments, most of them practice organs, to service a student body of 600. In
recent years, the number of students preparing for church vocations has fallen
to 40 percent of the enrollment, resulting in "excess capacity" in
pipe organ resources. The decision to sell five instruments was prompted in
part by the desire to convert one practice room into a piano studio and another
into a computer lab. This example is perhaps exceptional in view of the high
percentage of the student body using the instruments. Nevertheless, it
underscores the close relationship between enrollment and resource needs, and
how swiftly an adjustment occurs when need declines.

Kent State University

Kent State University, a public institution in northeast
Ohio, with 22,000 students, including 300 enrolled in the music department, dropped organ instruction in the spring of 1981. The number of students in the combined degree program in sacred music and applied organ performance had dropped to six, far below the number needed to justify a tenured faculty position and to continue practice room space begging for other uses.  Ironically, the school had formerly counted as its organ instructors two of the most promising young keyboard artists and teachers in the country in John Ferguson, now at St. Olaf College, and Larry Smith, now at Indiana University. The enrollment collapse was the direct result of the dismal outlook for organ graduates in the marketplace. This was confirmed in an informal survey by Dr. Walter Watson, then head of the music department, which revealed that the number of full-time organ positions in the greater New York City area, had fallen from 600 in the 1950s to between 150 and 200 in the 1980s, a situation thought to prevail throughout the country.12

The absence of supporting curricula at Kent State in
philosophy and theology to augment the sacred music degree added to the
rationale for discontinuing the program. Two small practice organs were sold to
churches and some thought has been given to selling the 20-rank studio organ
and using the proceeds to update the auditorium instrument, now in need of
restoration. In recent years the financial fortunes of the school were severely
impacted by the statewide budget crunch, which forced the music department to
cancel the marching band temporarily, to remove telephones from faculty offices
and require faculty to pay for photocopying materials for their classes. A
small foundation stipend carried them over until budgets were restored but the
organ instruction situation has not changed. This may be an extreme example of
the financial indigence of music departments, but it is certainly not an
isolated one.

University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point

The University of Wisconsin at Stevens Point is a striking
illustration of the predicament of public institutions which are acutely
sensitive to enrollment shifts and budget constraints.
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
When organ enrollment collapsed and the
organist retired, the faculty position was eliminated and the decision made to
sell the four pipe organs and channel the diminishing resources elsewhere. The
plan now is to also sell the Ronald Wahl tracker instrument and use the
proceeds to rebuild the Steinway concert grand piano. Organ programs in the majority of schools in the state university system, not including the University at Madison, are reported to be severely curtailed or defunct.

Syracuse University

In view of its stellar position in postwar graduate organ
study, the experience of Syracuse University is revealing and particularly
significant.  The Syracuse program
rose to prominence under the leadership of Arthur Poister, a much-admired
teacher and an eloquent spokesman for the organist profession, together with
his colleagues and successors Will Headlee and Donald Sutherland.
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
With the University of Michigan and the
Eastman School of Music, Syracuse shared the distinction of being three premier
graduate schools for organ study in the country. In the 1950s, the programs
benefited enormously from "degree inflation," as Headlee calls it,
which was then capturing the profession: the DMA supplanted the MMus as the
terminal degree in organ performance and became the "union card" for
an academic appointment.

The halcyon days at Syracuse were a manifestation of
promising academic job opportunities for organists, the attraction of the
trophy Holtkamp instruments in Crouse Auditorium and Hendricks Chapel, the
magnetism of Poister and his staff, and the all-important pipeline from Oberlin
to Syracuse where Poister had earlier taught. But Poister knew it couldn't
last. He often said to Headlee, "When will the bubble burst?"13 When
it did, in the late 1970s, the university moved swiftly to drastically curtail
the organ program.  Four of the six
Holtkamp "Martini" practice organs were sold.  When student credit hours plummeted to near zero, the administration elected not to replace Headlee upon his retirement and to outsource organ instruction with a part-time teacher, Katherine Pardee. She was the director of music at Hendricks Chapel whose funding is totally separate from the instructional budget of the school. The experience at Syracuse is an all-to-frequent example of how rapidly a once proud program that educated a generation of prominent teachers and performers can decline and virtually disappear.

The linkage between the initial investment and now
disinvestment decisions in pipe organs as a function of student enrollment
(demand) is an expression of the "imputation" theory of value
(zürechnung) propounded by the eminent Austrian economist Carl Menger
(1840-1921) wherein the demand (bedarf) for and value of an economic good
echoes backward into its resource base. In a market analogy, if the demand for
cigarettes falls, the demand and price for leaf tobacco declines and then the
need for and rent on tobacco growing land recedes.14

Within the music department curriculum and faculty, the
organ teacher is often odd man out. 
This sad situation is attributable to more than the decline in students
and credit hours. It is primarily a reflection of what Arthur Birkby of the
University of Wyoming calls the "softening" or "dumbing
down" of the pedagogical approach to music education.15 The contemporary
emphasis upon country, gospel, jazz and rock-based music means students have
decided that it is no longer necessary to be well-grounded in classical
precepts. Thus the core curriculum in theory, counterpoint, analysis and
composition, where the pipe organ and its music would be recognized, has been cast aside.16 Given this mindset, is it any wonder the organ is viewed today as a "fuddy duddy" instrument, as Birkby laments?  Rübsam adds that with organs and pianos being pushed into the corner in churches in favor of of electronic keyboards and all manner of audio-mixing devices, a career in church music is no longer attractive to the serious musician.

A Call to Action

In the foregoing analysis we have demonstrated how
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
economic and political realities in
higher education together with the indifference of campus leaders and state
legislatures, with their slide-rule mentality (and without shame), have
resulted in a tragic loss of recognition of the pipe organ's time-honored place
in academe. These examples of the liquidation of pipe organs are perhaps logical
and defensible in view of the vice-grip economics overshadowing our
institutions of higher learning today. Yet the impression lingers that the
decisions are based primarily on expediency and without proper recognition of
the place of the instrument among the "untouchables" which would
certainly be true of other campus jewels. One cannot imagine, for example, that
if enrollment in astronomy courses declined, the school would sell-off the
telescope and turn the observatory into a laboratory for genetic engineering.

The following are suggestions that can and must be
implemented to stem the tide of indifference, neglect and abandonment, and to
protect and promote the King of Instruments in institutional settings.

The first step is an awareness of the urgency of the problem
and the need to take determined action. Pipe organ aficionados--professors,
alumni, organists and concerned laymen--must be ready to "lie down in
front of the bulldozer" (so to speak) to stop the carnage. This begins
with periodic inquiries on the status of the organs on campus and expressions
of ongoing interest in their well-being. The "Friends of the Northrop
Organ" at the University of Minnesota, described by Charles Hendrickson in
an article in the March, 1996 edition of The Diapason, is a fine example of the
type of organization that should be established at every school.17

The organ professor must be visible, articulate, and
proactive in promoting the instrument. 
In short, he or she must become an evangelist with fire in the belly, or
as one observer said:  "The
organist has got to come out of his hole, and fight!" They must interact
more frequently with the faculty and campus at large, and use every opportunity
to make sure the organ and its music are included in applicable courses. For
example, to advance the organ as an intellectual and cultural resource to the
larger campus community the organist, in cooperation with professional
organizations, could develop a slide lecture for presentation to classes in
history (western civilization), philosophy (aesthetics), architecture,
engineering and others.

The organist should solicit a firm commitment from the
university administration to recognize and maintain the instruments on campus.
To protect the fine Holtkamp organs at Syracuse, Will Headlee orchestrated a
celebration of the Centennial of Crouse Auditorium. The Organ Historical
Society citation for "an instrument of historic merit worthy of
preservation" was read to the gathering which included the chancellor on
the platform. In responding the chancellor gave assurances that the organ was
recognized and would continue to be honored. Headlee cautions that every time
there is a changing of the guard one has to go in and sell the situation all
over again.

Yale University, under the inspired leadership of Thomas
Murray, university organist, and Nicholas Thompson-Allen and Joseph Dzeda, the
two associate organ curators, has reached out to various constituents on
campus. In a well-conceived effort to promote high visibility and awareness of the pipe organs at Yale, these men have encouraged music students, technology
classes, and other university organizations to schedule tours and
demonstrations of the instruments. Undergraduates expressing an interest in the
pipe organs and occasionally using them as a topic for a class term paper are
welcomed and given full co-operation.

During Alumni Reunion Weekend each Spring, Friday morning
and afternoon tours are conducted of the trophy Hutchings-Steere-Skinner organ
in Woolsey Hall for alumni and their families. Murray demonstrates and plays
the instrument and then the curators guide the visitors on a brief walk through
the chambers. This creates in the alumni a sense of "pride of
ownership" in the instrument and they recognize it and the other fine pipe
organs on campus as an integral part of the heart and soul of Yale University.
This effort was rewarded two years ago when an alumnus, who had joined the
group, was moved to finance the restoration of a rank of pipes which had been
taken out of the organ more than sixty years ago. 

The music department should work closely with other
departments to establish maintenance funding in the budgetary process and
encourage the administration to persuade the state legislature of the
legitimacy and necessity of maintenance allocations. At the University of
Washington, the organ professor, Carole Terry, can submit a requisition for
tuning or repairs but bureaucratic guidelines have thus far ruled out a service
contract. In an effort to confront the realities of the budgetary process and
yet find a way to work within the system, Larry Schou, at the University of
South Dakota, is attempting to consign the Skinner auditorium organ to the
music instruments museum budget to promote its restoration.

Pipe organs should be given maximum coverage in campus
publicity. This includes descriptions and photos in promotional material and
catalogs, post cards for sale in the bookstore (now at University of Wyoming),
and descriptions and comments in campus tours for visitors and prospective
students. The campus radio station could be requested to play classical organ
music every week.

The instruments can be promoted to non-music students
throughout the campus, encouraging them to sign up for lessons, perhaps by
student teachers, and practice 
time. This might include "open console," periods when
students, under the supervision of the faculty, can reserve time to play at
their leisure. Who knows, perhaps some engineering student who elects to relax
at the organ a couple of hours a week, will come back in twenty years, having
made a fortune in computers or genetics, and endow the whole department!

Given the realities of diminished funding, organ teachers
may well have to perform routine maintenance, primarily tuning but perhaps also
minor repairs. In their devotion to the instrument, they must do everything
possible to keep it playing.  When
a pipe organ is no longer playable, it is half way out the door.

As a last resort, schools may come to rely on volunteers to
keep organs playing. This has worked successfully at the University of
Minnesota where the devoted service of Gordon Schultz is well recognized.
Professional organ technicians throw up their hands at this prospect, but it
may be the only re-course. The American Theater Organ Society has been notably
successful in harnessing the skills and energies of enthusiasts. Many of their
members play a major role in the restoration and preservation of these period
instruments.

Workers and community leaders now speak of themselves as
"stakeholders" in the fortunes of the businesses and community where
they work and live, with a vested interest that transcends the exigencies of
competition and profit. Perhaps this concept should be applied in a college
setting with professors, students and alumni viewed as stakeholders in the
cultural jewels of the campus.

In a followup article the author will explore promising
developments in the academic fortunes of the pipe organ.
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
Research for this paper has disclosed
several situations where institutional recognition is encouraging, endowments
are forthcoming and student enrollment is growing. Readers who know of such
illustrations are encouraged to reply to the author on his e-mail:
[email protected]                

For research input and critical comments on earlier drafts
of this paper, the author gratefully acknowledges: Corliss Arnold, Nelson
Barden, Jack Bethards, Dean Billmeyer, Arthur Birkby, Joan DeVee Dixon, Joanne
Domb, Joseph Dzeda, John Ferguson, Laura Gayle Green, Yuko Hayashi, Will
Headlee, Herbert Huestis, Dale Jensen, the late Stephen Long, Richard
McPherson, Charles McManis, John Near, Albert Neutel, Charles Orr, Katherine
Pardee, Robert Rosen, Wolfgang Rübsam, Larry Schou, Steve Shoemaker, Albert
Smith, Larry Smith, John Chappell Stowe, Carole Terry, and Walter Watson.

Notes

                  1.
style='mso-tab-count:1'>             
Campbell-Kelly, Martin ed., Charles Babbage: Passages from the Life of a Philosopher, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1994, Introduction and Chapter V and VII.

                  2.
style='mso-tab-count:1'>             
Telephone interview with Will Headlee, July 9, 1996.

                  3.
style='mso-tab-count:1'>             
Telephone interview with Albert C. Shaw, October 1, 1996.

                  4.
style='mso-tab-count:1'>             
Proffitt, Steve, Interview with Judith Balfe,  "Is Support for the Arts Literally Dying Off?", Los Angeles Times, February 23, 1996, p. M-3.

                  5.
style='mso-tab-count:1'>             
Veblen,
Thorstein, The Higher Learning in America:  A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business
Men,  New York:
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
B. W. Huebsch, 1918.
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
See also Joseph Dorfman, Thorstein
Veblen and His America, Seventh Edition, Clifton, N.J.: Augustus M. Kelley,
1972, pp. 234, 395-410.

                  6.
style='mso-tab-count:1'>             
Interview
with John Hose and Adolph Zajic, 1964. Another was the four-manual sixty-rank
instrument for Wilson College in Chambersburg, Pennsylvania with a stoplist
designed by Virgil Fox. The famous Whitelegg diapason chorus on the erecting
room floor in Hagerstown was purchased by Trinity Methodist Church in
Youngstown, Ohio in 1942, and later incorporated in the great division of the
four-manual eighty-nine rank instrument completed in 1947. Whitelegg died in
1944. See The Diapason, August, 1937, p. 1, June, 1943, p. 22, August, 1947, p.
1.

20th-Century Church Music in Germany: An Overview

by Martin West
Default

The following deals with the most important debate in the German Christian churches: the crisis within the church and the consequences of that crisis to church music today.  Such a situation may easily create the impression of that whining attitude of which we Germans are usually suspicious. But the subject is very urgent to us, and we church musicians cannot ignore it by any means. Moreover, the fact that in Germany the whole system of professional church music as a unique cultural domain is put on half-pay, seems to justify the following statements of mine. The Protestant Church of Germany will hold the spotlight throughout my lecture because 1) I am a member of this church, and 2) I am able to show you the problems firsthand I mention here.

 

The following words are from articles in the Forum Kirchenmusik magazine, all of them chosen at random within the last year. They capture the essence of the problems I shall discuss.

1. Tastenhengst or entertainer--expectations of the parish for the church musician.

2. Stress, conflicts, squabbling--and this in the church?

                  3. Training in popular church music

                  4. Professional organization--why?

                  5. The need to cut costs in the church and the future of the church

                  6. Declaration about Protestant pedagogical responsibility concerning church music

                  7. Church music--the professional image in transition

                  8. Cooperation of church musicians and theologians

                  9. Declaration concerning the situation of church music positions in the German Protestant Church

 10. Declaration of the Central Council of church musicians concerning the evaluation of professional     church musicians

 11. Changes of the laws for (hiring) and firing

 12. Being a church musician in the North German Lutheran Church is like being caught between preaching and at the same time being fired (a German play on words: "Ein Spagat zwischen Kündigung und Verkündigung")

If you now have the impression that we church musicians no longer find any joy or satisfaction in our positions, I have to admit that it may be like that in some cases. For it is undeniable that in many parts of the church we have a climate of insecurity and fear. This concerns all staff members, including theologians.

Protestant and Catholic Churches in Germany: Basic Structures

Protestant church music in Germany was characterized during the last 50 years by great prosperity and a high degree of commitment. But now it would appear that we have reached a situation of a great crisis similar to that of the Amtskirche (official church) itself.

The rich variety in our church music was developed from the new beginning and the efforts to revive it in large Christian churches in Germany after the Second World War. There seems to be no other country with a Christian tradition where church music has such an important place within the church structure--shown, for example, in the distinction between full-time and part-time positions for which one needs adequate diplomas corresponding to the classification of church musician positions. To understand the problems concerning church music in Germany, it is necessary to understand the structure of the big churches.

At the time of the foundation of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949, the Protestant Church in Germany, with its respective Landeskirchen (regional state churches), and the Catholic Church signed a contract with the state, following the end of the Nazi dictatorship and the end of the "official state-approved churches" dominated by the regime. This contract regulates and establishes the system of coordination between the state and churches. Both Protestant and Catholic churches demand their independence given to them by national law and guaranteed by the federal constitution.

Within the last fifty years we in Germany have developed a system of so-called Amtskirche, whose presence is demonstrated in many spheres of society. This happens by common consent and is often supported by the state in a kind of symbiosis. The institutionalization of the churches in state and society led to an enormous increase of influence of the Amtskirchen, as in the question of religion as a subject in schools, or in being granted the right of running social services like kindergartens or hospitals under church auspices, often in fact with the churches functioning as the sole bearer of financial responsibility. In that sense the expression Volkskirche (people's church) was developed. It both refers to the fact that in Germany most people belong to one of the two large churches and also to the responsibility these churches have for the people. As for the first point, the present decline of membership percentages appears to imply that the Volkskirche is approaching the end of its existence or, at least, that it needs a radically renewed orientation. The state collects a tax from individuals for support of the church--but one may opt out of paying this tax.

The individual Landeskirchen, whose borders usually correspond to those of the German states (Bundesländer), all have their own church constitutions. (The borders of the Catholic dioceses are often different, due to historical tradition.) The Landeskirchen developed into Lutheran, Reformed, or United traditions. Their central organization is the EKD (Evangelische Kirche Deutschlands) with its General Synod. The Catholics have a similar organization in their Conference of German Bishops. Although the constitutions of the individual Landeskirchen may be different, they have the same organization, a parish with its council, the synod (deanery), and central synod (Landeskirche). This closely corresponds with the political structure of community (town, city), county, and state. A major difference between the Protestant and Catholic churches is the different emphasis of the role played by lay people.

In the Protestant Church, apart from their functions in services, theologians and laymen are considered equal. This may consequently lead to regional differences in parish life. On the synod level, for example in the Nordelbische Kirche (church in the north Elbe River area), there is financial independence. Other examples are the supervision of theologians and church workers, or the extensive autocracy of the local parish in my own Nordelbische Kirche. In contrast to that, the hierarchical structure of the Catholic Church of Germany is similar to those in many other countries. But the Catholic Church has nearly the same basic structure in church music organization as the Protestant churches.

The Crisis of the Amtskirchen

Secularization, individualism, the loss of values, moral and spiritual disorientation, self-complacency and sluggishness of the Amtskirchen are the keywords in the crisis of the church. Without any doubt, the system of the Amtskirche finds itself in a major crisis. The number of people who have left the church in the large cities is a simple demonstration of this fact.  Hamburg is an extreme example of that, as only about 34% of the population are still members of the church and pay church taxes. An apparent contradiction to this, though, is the rich and blooming church music offered in the Hauptkirchen, the main churches such as St. Michaelis, St. Jacobi, St. Petri, or St. Katherinen.

The subject of highest priority in all areas of community life has been, for a number of years, the so-called Struktur-    debatten (debate on administrative strucures within the church), or "How can a church still fulfill its varied tasks with less and less money," or if I may put it more bluntly, "Where shall the church start saving money?" What makes things even more difficult is my observation that there is a lack of self-critique and innovative thinking on the side of those who are responsible--namely the church's governing body.

The Special Situation of the Churches of East Germany

Since the reunification of Germany in 1989, the churches of East Germany have undergone a great change in many ways. Fewer and fewer people find their way to the church, since the church is no longer a center of resistance against the communist regime, a regime that had restricted all spiritual life over a long period of time. The number of people belonging to the church has dramatically diminished, even more than in the west of Germany. For that reason the financial problems are even greater than in the west. One example may suffice: despite its rich cultural and musical tradition, the city of Dresden offers only one Protestant A position, in the famous Kreuzkirche. And the choir of that church, the well-known Kreuzchor, is partly financed by the city of Dresden.

Church music training in the (formerly East) German Democratic Republic, by the way, had been different. A B musician got his training not only in church music but also as a deacon; s/he did not have the same qualifications as his/her counterpart in West Germany. This has now been assimilated to what we have in West Germany. In times of less money, one talks again about the match of training and positions. There are even sometimes advertisements showing that for a church musician they expect not only musical qualifications but also the background to do the work of a deacon or sexton.

Protestant and Catholic Church Music

Church music has its firm place in the Protestant Church, as even the church constitution gives it the official role co-equal to that of preaching the word. There are great differences between the individual Landeskirchen concerning the institutional endorsement of church music. Especially the Lutheran Nordelbische Kirche, with its rich tradition of highly-esteemed church music, remains passive in the face of new negative developments in this area. I shall later refer to the current problems in this particular Landeskirche.

About Training and Positions

One can earn a German church music degree (A or B) at any Staatliche Musikhochschule or at one of the Kirchenmusikschulen, which are either Protestant or Catholic. Other possibilities include studying church music at private conservatories, which offer only the B program.

Kirchenmusikschulen, as well as other organizations of the Landeskirchen, offer courses of two semesters for a non-professional degree; we call it C. Basically it is the same program, but on a lower level. Holding this C degree gives less-trained musicians a simple practical advantage: their income is slightly improved over unschooled musicians, and they are not depending so much on arbitrary payments.

Both programs--Catholic and Protestant--are nearly identical; however, all staff members are obliged to belong to their respective denomination. Even at the Staatliche Musikhochschulen there are always two departments of church music. And at every test, whether organ playing or hymnology, there will be a representative present of the respective church; otherwise the test is not regarded as legal.

The basis of training and positions is the B degree, which one usually earns after 6 to 8 semesters. It includes a complete variety of church music, in theory and in practice. In recent years attempts to improve the musician's knowledge in the field of popular music and children's choirs has occurred, although these attempts do not find common approval. At least the level of the B degree has gained a higher reputation within the last twenty years.

A student with an above-average diploma usually gains admittance to further studies of four semesters, ending with the A degree. At this level of studies, the focus is placed on artistic abilities, especially organ playing and choral and orchestral conducting. More and more A program students volunteer to do special studies. These students work primarily on the topics of organ playing or conducting, namely during studies abroad that often include practical experience in establishing performances of historical performance practice.

We already face budgetary deficits because of the financial problems of the Landeskirchen running the Kirchenmusikschulen. The well-known Johannisstift in Berlin was closed recently. Other Kirchenmusikschulen try to survive by cooperating with other schools. Even the Staatliche Musikhochschulen, though disposing of contracts with the churches, think about cooperation or cutting down their educational programs.

In Germany we have eighteen Staatliche Musikhochschulen and more than twenty Kirchenmusikschulen, or conservatories. It must be said quite clearly that there are too many of them, if you look at the opportunity of positions for graduates. For there is one perceptible tendency: not enough positions for all students. Often A musicians apply for B positions, and many of those are part-time positions!

It is not hard to explain the typical profile of a B position. It contains everything that can be done by a church musician--playing the organ, making music with vocal and instrumental groups and the community, and performing concerts, as the case may be. This may even include the performance of oratorios, depending on the local situation. I know of a B church where they perform Verdi's Requiem or similar repertory, on a remarkably high level. But this is not very common.

B positions are usually found in places with some favorable conditions allowing professional work. Here are the principles of our Central Council, as they are instrumental for having a B position in a parish:

First, the local conditions: a church with enough space for making music and an audience, appropriate rehearsal rooms and music scores for professional work

Second, the organ: it should have at least two manuals and pedal

Third, the choir: it must be possible to do qualified singing (which is not clearly defined)

Fourth, financial resources: there must be money enough for the various tasks of professional church music including performances with orchestra and soloists (in many places this is no longer possible!)

The A position does not fundamentally differ from a B position. Typical A churches are the larger churches, situated in the center of big cities, but may also be found in important towns in rural surroundings with sufficient resources. There have to be specific artistic achievements in organ playing and/or choral performance. The size of the church should be suitable for big events. The organ should have three manuals and allow the playing of pretentious organ literature. An accomplished choir (especially for a cappella repertory) is a decisive condition; the same is true as for regular performances of oratorios.

Many A positions, and some B too, have to take care of overseeing regional tasks: helping other colleagues in the district, teaching, shaping expert opinions, activities in the field of professional organizations, and so on. In most Landeskirchen these colleagues do this position in a combination of 75% parish and 25% district work; for example, the work being paid for by both parish and the synod. In the synods of my own Nordelbian Landeskirche, however, we have a different system: the respective colleagues do all the parish work and the deanery (synod) position for free, receiving money only for related expenses.

Within the last years the difference between A and B has become smaller-- last, but not least, because the standards of the B degree have risen. Therefore, we are now in dialogue to determine whether we should have only one professional church music degree.

All other parishes, in small villages or suburbs, have non-professional church musicians or none at all. The tendency is that it is more and more difficult to get people to do these tasks. The reasons for that may be different: there is certainly a connection to the changing situation of the professional church musician; additionally, many potential volunteer musicians have changed how they spend their leisure time, especially on weekends.

Popular Church Music

For several years, it has become possible at some schools to study "popular church music." For example, at the Fachakademie für evangelische Kirchenmusik at Bayreuth you can take popular church music courses for one year in an A or B program. The reason for this is "that there is, established in the church for many years now, a popular church music scene with bands, youth choirs, concerts and festivals, and publishers and editors' labels. In view of these numerous activities, church musicians should have appropriate competence to justify the importance of popular church music in spiritual context" (quoting from the Fachakademie's literature). In a weekly two-hour program the contents of theory, hands-on practical knowledge (performance in a band, or bandleader), and computer/music electronics (arranging, composition, printing with computer software) are taught in close connection with each other. The subject of harmony includes analysis of the standards of jazz, pop, and rock, chord symbols, reharmonization, and scales. While listening to sound tracks of different music styles one tries to connect practical music making with typical patterns of the band. The students gain basic knowledge of playing band instruments as the basis for creating their own arrangements. Of what use is the best arrangement if it can only be played by a professional musician? Most students develop the right feeling that a funk can really "groove!"

The students are taught one hour a week in groups. They learn harmonization of tunes, voicings, accompaniment patterns in various styles, solo improvisation (for example, blues), and so on. The intention to train professional pop musicians in one year would be wrong. The real aim is to sensitize and interest the students in order to channel enthusiasm for this music with which many people identify nowadays.

The echo to this development has been--as could not be expected differently--by no means unanimous. Most Musikhochschulen and most Kirchenmusikschulen look at these new tendencies with great skepticism, but also with some sense of powerlessness.

About Training of Ministers

A few remarks on the situation of theological training are necessary only because we are concerned with it. Classes offered during one's theological training on hymnology and liturgy have decayed; therefore, we often needlessly face problems concerning the competence of both church musicians and ministers. On one hand, the minister may decide freely, according to his conscience and taste, how the service shall unfold. On the other hand, the church musician is just as responsible for shaping the service. As expressed in the Nordelbisches Kirchenmusikergesetz (Church Musician's Handbook), one can read that in case of doubt, solve the problem on your own!

This is a dilemma because the qualifications of the two sides are very often different. Sometimes there are complaints about non-professional handling of the sermon and the proper use of language. Rhetoric knowledge and simple rules of technically good speaking are rare. In seminary training, there was no opportunity afforded the seminarians to experience the liturgy and hymns as they are to be sung. Perhaps a knowledge of appropriate liturgical music would have kept theology students from being reported to the police for disturbing the peace (as once did the young Martin Luther) by singing in quiet streets at night. Nonetheless, most young theologians are very interested in teamwork with church musicians.

Almost everything I have said about Protestant church music is transferable to the Catholic church. Small differences may be found in the hierarchical system. A difference may be the interpretation of everyone's role: the Catholic church musician usually works independently, while Protestant colleagues are more or less obliged to partnership or teamwork.

The Situation in the Nordelbische lutherische Kirche

I love music, and I do not like the "enthusiasts" who condemn it. I love music, firstly, because it is a gift of God and not of men; secondly, it makes peoples' souls happy; thirdly, it drives off the devil; fourthly, it creates innocent joy, thereby outbreaks of anger, desires, and pride disappear. I say that music is in the first rank after theology . . . ; fifthly, because it reigns at times of peace. So, bear it, but this art will be better off with those who live after us, because they will live in peace. . . .

To some of my musical colleagues within the Nordelbische Kirche this famous quote from Martin Luther, dated 1530, may sound like a scornful description of the present day situation of our church music.

In this context I would like to call your attention to the Nordelbische Kirche again. It is the area of Schleswig-Holstein, including Hamburg and Lübeck, and is the newest of all German Protestant Landeskirchen. Although it did not exist before 1978, it has attracted the attention of the public much more than any other church. There may be several reasons for this; perhaps no other German church follows such varied theological and political tendencies, which constantly fight violently against each other. Or think of the fact that only recently the first German female bishop's seat was established in Hamburg. Or think of the dissents and intrigues about the successor of the Hamburg St. Michaeliskantor, of which you could read in all important German newspapers, and even in the magazine Der Spiegel. In many ways the Nordelbische Kirche reflects the essential aspects of clerical reality.

The Lutheran tradition of a singing and music-making church has always been extremely rich in this area. Since their foundation, Hanseatic cities such as Hamburg, Lübeck, or Lüneburg were able to afford outstanding church music. The heritage of that time can still be noticed, for example, in the wonderful historic organs, most of them beautifully restored. Names like Scheidemann, Weckmann, Tunder, Lübeck, or Buxtehude are widely known. Beginning in this century, in the 1950s, a dense network of professional church music centers has been woven, especially in the Hamburg and Lübeck areas--more than in any other part of Germany.

Against the background of this musical tradition it is even more unpleasant than anywhere else to see our whole profession disintegrate or disappear. There are no concepts up to this moment to prevent this tendency. The Landeskirchenmusikdirektor, the head of church music in the Nordelbische Kirche, sometimes sarcastically refers to himself as the "grave-digger of Nordelbische church music."

This drastic definition is certainly not always helpful, because the representative of church music should not speak like this in public, but there is an essential point in it, which you can verify easily by statistics. For that purpose I want to give you some actual figures, which you can find in two texts edited in two memoirs (Denkschriften) by Landeskirchenmusikdirektor Dieter Frahm in 1995 and 1998. Behind the crude numbers lie explosives for many church musicians. Around 1980 we in the Nordelbische Kirche had almost no professional part-time positions. By 1995 there were 55 A positions and 254 B positions, 90 of which were already part-time positions. Only three years later, in 1998, this changed to 51 A and 213 B positions, 81 of which are now part-time positions. In the large city of Hamburg, in a period of 8 to 9 years, more than 30% of church musicians lost their full-time B positions; in Lübeck more than 20%. It is not an exaggeration to speak about a dramatic development. Frahm wrote "If the basis of having professional positions shakes and crumbles--and this is the case now--the whole tradition of church music and culture will die."

The shining medal granted by the privilege of extensive authority within the local parishes now shows its darker side: every parish can practically do what it wants. And unfortunately it is true that any church council, when it feels the necessity of saving money, first of all kills the music. And no piece of advice from higher clerical authorities has to be feared because the ways of decision in financial and other matters are usually organized on the lower level of the parishes, which forms a remarkable difference to other Landeskirchen in Germany. There is no strict supervision; there are spongy laws that may be interpreted in different ways, and therefore often produce arbitrariness of church councils.

The problem of part-time positions is serious also in another respect: the contracts are often obscure or problematic. A person is offered a half-time position, which also means half the wage, but it is expected that the work exceeds fifty percent by far. And if some critic, not long ago, could rightly have teased us church musicians with the malicious remark that the abundance of "nordelbian" church music is now shrinking down to a normal standard, we could respond with the same tone that there are now some areas where you do not find any professional church musicians at all. Certainly the large Hamburg Hauptkirchen like St. Michaelis or St. Petri or St. Jakobi will always want and will have outstanding church music. But in middle-sized and smaller cities the shortages have already caused painful gaps.

In this context, we are aware of increasing demands from the side of our theologians that we should increase our commitment of personal time as an addition to our "contract" time, an attempt that ignores the already high level of that private commitment most of us currently exert. It is indeed a subtle pressure that is often exerted on the staff. Even "squabbling" is no longer a foreign word in parish life.

There are not many places in the Nordelbian area anymore where you can observe the will and the readiness to look for solutions on the basis of real solidarity--a term which is still an essential principle that should not be dispensed with. And the people in charge sometimes disregard the fact that church music often is an important activity in a parish and sometimes it is the sole activity that remains, as it continues to be attractive to people of all age groups.

There are some hopeful attempts to solve these problems, which in part have already been put into reality, and they are usually summed up under the term of "cooperation." This works pretty well in big cities, especially when the parishes are within neighboring districts. And, in addition, single synods try to develop regional employment schemes and to put the burden on positions of church musicians under their influence, which is to say that the synods, quoting the idea of solidarity, ask certain favors from the single parishes that they, for moral--not legal--reasons cannot possibly deny. The goal is to guarantee a kind of minimum employment within the area, as we have had for a long time in south German churches. The motto is: Better one full-time position than two part-time positions!

I myself work in a group of theologians and church musicians who all try to develop a system of safe positions in our area. Ten years ago in my deanery (synod) with its 22 parishes, we had one A position, 8 full-time B positions, one part-time position, and the rest were non-professional ones. Now we still have the A position, three full-time B positions, and six part-time positions.

Current Tendencies

Here are some recent advertisements from magazines concerning church music positions. These advertisements cast a spotlight on the actual situation and emotional sensitivity on the side of both employers and employees:

Landshut (100% A). This represents in a good sense the typical A position, an offer which is now becoming something like a fossil: favorable opportunities, rich endowment, support by a fundraising organization, real commitment to high level church music, well-organized choir groups.

Düsseldorf (80% A). This advertisement refers to the position of Oskar Gottlieb Blarr, a widely-known colleague, who had exerted his position with unique profile and style. Now the same standard is requested, but at only 80% of his former salary.

Göttingen (90% A). Once more, a well-known A position in Germany, and again the same amount and quality of work is expected from the side of the future position holder, this time at 90% salary.

Eppendorf (formerly an A position). This time, the A position is in one of the well-known and wealthy neighborhoods of Hamburg, yet it is only a small church. It is the parish in which the Nordelbische Landeskirchenmusikdirektor formerly worked, and payments are now reduced to the ones of a B position. Of course, the traditional standard of work has to be preserved.

Quickborn (temporary). It is really unnerving to read this ad because it symptomatically reveals the present-day problems: the offer is for a three-year time period at 100% payments of a B position, then going down to 75%, and then, who knows?

Bielefeld (B 60%). This time the offer is just 60% of a full-time position.

Herchen (B 50%). Another variation of the same melody: a 50% position, an ad that one will find very often. An interesting item is the note that the parish could also do with a non-professional church musician. It is interesting, because the parish officials are bold enough to trespass the borders of legal rights in mixing up two levels of professional qualifications.

Ottensen (B 50-100%). This last example demonstrates something like autocratic behavior of certain parishes. Here, the important message is that they can put a person on the position at payments varying from 50 to 100%, as the case may be. At any rate, the parish, as usual, wants the complete spectrum of church music. Note the sarcasm at the end of the advertisement, where it says:

We do not consider a church musician

-who regards the parish as his monopoly

-who believes that he can do best if he is left alone high up on the organ

-who would be unwilling to play on the organ the famous tune of Pippi Longstocking [a character in Astrid Lindgren's children's movies].

Conclusion

Every profession undergoes certain changes over time, and, of course, church music is not an exception. Nevertheless, it is surprising how often and how easily valuable traditions and successful work in a famous field of German culture are regarded as questionable and dispensable. Many people say that within the next generation the position of the church musician in its traditional form and structure that has grown for decades will cease to exist. This will not surprise those who anyway speculate that the Amtskirche with its obsolete peculiarities will not be able to survive. Some prophets predict that churches in Germany will move in a direction like the ones in North America and, as a matter of fact, there are certain symptoms of such a development. At any rate, quite a number of my colleagues are convinced that, within a few years, our profession of church music will not exist anymore.

I myself do not feel as our "grave-digger," since work, itself, with people, still offers great joy. There are not many professions in which the meaning of "profession" and "vocation" are so close together--in my language we have the play of words Beruf and Berufung. In this sense I am sure to speak for most of my colleagues who really love their profession. Often it is solely church music that opens the church door for many people who otherwise are very critical of the Amtskirche as an institution. Herein lies a great opportunity for the church of securing itself, an opportunity that should be appreciated more and squandered less.

Robert Noehren: In Memoriam

December 16, 1910-August 4, 2002

by William Osborne, J. Bunker Clark, Haig Mardirosian, and Ronald E. Dean

J. Bunker Clark is editor of Harmonie Park Press. He taught organ and theory at Stephens College (1957-59), was organist and choirmaster at Christ Church Cranbrook (1959-61), taught music history and harpsichord at the University of California, Santa Barbara (1964-65), and music history at the University of Kansas from 1965 until retiring in 1993.

 

William Osborne holds three degrees from the University of Michigan. He serves Denison University in Granville, Ohio as Distinguished Professor of Fine Arts, University Organist, and Director of Choral Organizations.

 

Haig Mardirosian is Associate Dean of Academic Affairs and Professor of Music at American University. He is also Organist and Choirmaster at the Church of the Ascension and Saint Agnes, Washington, DC, and a recitalist, recording artist, writer, and consultant on organ building.

Ronald E. Dean is on the faculty of Centenary College, Shreveport, Louisiana.

Default

Robert Noehren died on August 4 in San Diego, California, at the age of 91. (See "Nunc Dimittis," The Diapason, September 2002, p. 8.) International recitalist, recording artist, author, scholar, professor and university organist at the University of Michigan, and organbuilder, Noehren enjoyed a long and remarkable career, and was clearly one of the major figures of our profession in the 20th century.

His many recordings and recitals evidenced a special kind of organ playing: the highest standards of musicianship, devoid of superficial excesses, quiet and controlled console manner; indeed, his technique seemed to become quieter and easier the more difficult and virtuosic the music became. He continued to practice the organ daily and record up until his death, carried on extensive correspondence, had plans for another commercial recording on his organ in Buffalo, was preparing a talk for the AIO convention this month, was working on a cookbook of his favorite recipes, and continued to enjoy music, art, fine wine, good food, and friends from all over the world.

Below follow tributes in Noehren's honor, by William Osborne, Bunker Clark, and Haig Mardirosian, and a review by Ronald Dean of Noehren's Bach CD which was released last year, in addition to a listing of his articles and news releases as featured in The Diapason. Requiescat in pace.

--Jerome Butera

Robert Noehren: A Remembrance

When Jerry Butera, Ron Dean and I shared a meal during the Organ Historical Society gathering in Chicago on the final day of June, we regaled ourselves with tales about and from the man who had had such a seminal influence on us and a host of others, assuming that he would endure virtually forever, little anticipating the shocking news of his sudden death only weeks later. He had suffered the loss of his devoted wife only months earlier, but on the evidence of telephone conversations had seemed quickly to reconcile himself to this new phase of his incredibly rich life, determined to get on with his latest passions, energetically practicing daily at age ninety-one on his electronic [sic!] house organ, wrestling with what he could possibly say to a conclave of pipe organ builders in Los Angeles during an upcoming invited lecture, listening intently to CDs drawn from his immense collection, having been recently attracted particularly to the playing of pianist Ivo ogorelich.

A consummate man of the organ, he was nonetheless not preoccupied with the instrument, always fascinated by a wide range of human understanding.  For example, when the Noehrens made the decision to relocate to suburban San Diego after a particularly harsh Ann Arbor winter, the significant tragedy of their transfer was a wayward moving van stranded in the desert heat of the Southwest, a delay that turned the man's substantial and valuable wine collection to vinegar. I suspect that in retrospect he might have preferred to express himself through a medium other than the organ, since he was constantly dissatisfied with so many examples of the instrument, especially his inability to make music on them to his satisfaction. In fact, he suggested that his students could learn more about elegant music-making by observing a fine singer, violinist or pianist, and, when time permitted, he practiced Chopin or Debussy at the piano, although never in public.

It seems a bit incredible that he retired from studio teaching at the University of Michigan more than four decades ago, and that at least a few of his students have preceded him in death. I, for one, found him a rather reluctant pedagogue. When provoked, he could be enormously enthusiastic and insightful, but one had to work to attract his attention. He loved to tell a story that he attributed to George Faxon, but which I suspect was meant to mirror his own predicament. Supposedly Faxon had in his Boston studio a very comfortable upholstered chair where he ensconced himself as he directed a student to play straight through a big Bach prelude and fugue. As the piece proceeded, he would brush the lint off his jacket, adjust his shoelaces, settle back, and gradually fall completely asleep. The student, having finished his performance, would turn expectantly, at which point Faxon would suddenly rouse himself and blurt out: "Bravo! Play it again!"

Robert Noehren also frustrated and even infuriated many in a profession rife with calcified credos by remaining in a constant condition of quest. I joked that it was impossible to ride a Noehren bandwagon because, as his would-be disciples were clambering on one side, he had already jumped off the other and moved on to some new position. Recall the man's seminal role in the organ Renaissance in this country. He was one of the first to study the classic European instruments to the extent that he was able to understand and explain what made the instruments of Schnitger and Cavaillé-Coll tick. Those of us privileged to experience his organ design course can vouch for that wisdom. It was also Robert Noehren who was crucial in bringing to this country in 1957 that groundbreaking von Beckerath instrument in Cleveland's Trinity Lutheran Church. I can remember driving from Ann Arbor to Cleveland in a snowstorm to experience the incredible revelations that it offered. So, how did a man devoted to the principles the Beckerath manifested become a builder of instruments based on direct electric action and incredible amounts of borrowing and duplexing? Hard to say, except to acknowledge that he later pretty much disavowed that facet of his career, although expressing annoyance over those attempts to redress some of the mechanical problems he bequeathed the instruments' owners. He did assert that his foray into organ building resulted from his failure to find an established builder who was willing put his ideals into practice. Recall also that the best of his instruments were and are ones of distinction, and that he was a pioneer in considering the possibility of computer-driven combination systems, even though the clunky, punchcard system that he and a Michigan Engineering colleague devised seems hopelessly antiquated now.

Even though he has left us physically, his legacy will surely survive in the form of his immense discography and the many provocative, sometimes quixotic writings published in this journal and elsewhere.

What will survive as well for those of us privileged to know him is the memory of a man with a generous sense of humor (I will never forget the look on his face when asked in a studio class by a pompous doctoral student how one properly mounts the bench); an immense, eclectic repertory (e. g., as I recall, virtually nobody on this side of the Atlantic was aware of Tournemire when Noehren began to champion the man); an intense musicality at his chosen instrument that nonetheless refused curtailment by any of the various performance "isms" by which the profession lives (Furthermore, I, as one who was privileged to assist him often, for example in the series of sixteen all-Bach programs he played in Hill Auditorium before such marathons became fashionable, was always amazed that, while he advocated marking scores extensively, he always seemed to play from pages untouched by a pencil.); an incredible range of experiences (e. g., as a young church organist in Buffalo being asked to play the two existing Hindemith sonatas for their composer, thereby indirectly provoking the writing of the last of the trilogy); a man of immense principle who retired from active teaching prematurely when confronted with a Michigan dean who asked him to create the country's largest organ department (he seems to have been prescient enough to have anticipated the future state of the profession and thus suggested as an alternative the country's finest, albeit compact organ program); and, last, but hardly least, the sense that organists are all too often insular in their perspective, encouraging all with whom he was associated to seek out and embrace the full  range of human experience.

RN, we will miss you.

--William Osborne

From his editor

"Gee, it's hard to play the organ, isn't it?"--cliché by Robert Noehren after hearing a student trying to play a difficult piece.

"Gee, it's hard to produce a book about the organ"--my cry in the process of working with Bob on An Organist's Reader.

Bob had been talking about doing a book for some years, but I'm proud of persuading him to begin in earnest in 1995. He sent a box two years later, and after two more years of phone calls and letters concerning the details, the box was sent to Harmonie Park Press in February 1997, and the result appeared in November 1999.

I'd known Bob since going to Ann Arbor in 1950, but after my piano days unfortunately never took organ with him. Nonetheless, I was lucky to audit several of his classes on the history of the organ--which, in retrospect, helped considerably in checking details of historic instruments. Even then, it was embarrassing to both of us to have a good friend point out the omission of thirteen pedal stops from the 1576 organ of  the Georgenkirche, Eisenach. (Harmonie Park Press has an errata slip, or get it at .) But this omission had not been discovered when that article had previously been published in the Riemenschneider Bach Institute's Bach no fewer than three times, 1975, 1985, and 1995! It's only logical that an organ associated with Bach would have more than two pedal registers, no?

He correctly defended Grobgedackt, against my proposal of Großgedackt. As for another detail, does one use the modern German "K" for Katharinenkirche, or the original spelling Catharinenkirche, Hamburg? (we used the latter). Lüdingworth has an umlaut; otherwise it would seem to be a village in England. So does the composer Jean-Jacques Grünenwald, even though he was French. The foregoing represents a survey of some 54 pages of letters on my computer, which also has comments on a trip to Italy; Eloise's new hip, fall 1997; and his bout with cancer, early 2000.

I had attended many of his Ann Arbor recitals, and have seen the two-story end of the Noehren living room in Ann Arbor which housed his Hausorgel. But Lyn and I really got to know Bob much better when he taught at the University of Kansas, fall 1975; we had Thanksgiving and several other similar occasions together. What a wonderful human being! I already miss our more recent phone chats, in which he described his interest in a proper diet (indeed, published as an article in these pages last year), in our mutual enjoyment of a pre-dinner drink, his interest in audio equipment and recent recordings (usually not of organ music), and in a joke. And I miss his Christmas cards (the design of one is on the cover of his book).

Bob Noehren was very modest--but a hard worker when preparing a recital. He was not vain, but I'm certain he was very proud of the discography and recitals (a representation of programs appears in his book). Above all, in spite of and perhaps due to, his quiet and unassuming manner, his playing never highlighted the performer, but always the music, as if to say "I've studied this piece hard, and here is what I found out."

--J. Bunker Clark

Letters from Noehren

I never met Robert Noehren, yet I am humbled to be able to call him a friend. In the last three years of his life, Noehren and I had corresponded regularly through a series of letters, a thread of correspondence initiated somewhat coincidently.

In my academic administrative capacity, I was at work during 1997 with a project team charged with drafting a self-study report to my university's regional accrediting agency. Our member from the university's publications office, Trudi Rishikoff, saw to the style and editing of the finished document. At some stage of the process, Trudi mentioned that she had learned that I was an organist. Did I know her Uncle Bob?

Uncle Bob, it turned out, was Robert Noehren. With what must have been obvious mirth at this serendipitous news, I told Trudi of my high esteem for Noehren, the thrill of having played a recital on one of his instruments, the honor of having reviewed several of his recordings for both The American Organist and Fanfare, but even more, of the inspiration that I had derived from listening to him perform, both on disc and live, early in my career. I asked Trudi to convey those sentiments and my kindest respects to her uncle.

About the same time, my editors forwarded for review a CD comprising reissues of various Lyrichord recordings by Robert Noehren. These amounted to seminal performances on several of his instruments (as well as others) and an assortment of repertoire attesting to the performer's all-embracing musical interests. The disc merited its title, "A Robert Noehren Retrospective."

Months later, a long letter arrived from Robert Noehren, the first of many in which we discussed issues of mutual interest--musicians, repertoire, organs. Noehren's beautifully composed and printed texts (for openers, I marveled at the deliberate care in writing these and his obvious fluency at computing, something quite remarkable for a man about to turn 90). The composition and printing mirrored what one heard in his meticulous musicianship and performance. His critical but calculated opinions about music matched his gifted and insightful interpretation of music. His thoughts about the music and musicians of his early years in particular bespoke his own deference to tradition, origins, and lineage in composition, organ building, and pedagogy. In sum, these letters represented valedictory notes to a new friend, but they were frank, surprisingly modest, and very generous in tone and spirit. Noehren, it turned out, had wanted to contact me for some time and he had done his research too. He had gone out and found recordings by his correspondent and he had closely read any number of reviews of books and recordings. He was sizing me up!

I had just released a recording of the Suite for Organ, by Paul de Maleingreau. I had not known that Noehren regularly played the toccata from it back in the 1930s. He clearly missed the piece adding that " . . . since it is no longer in my head I am glad to be able to hear it again . . ." Of our mutual interest in Maleingreau, he observed that "it [the toccata] is such a fine work and no one else seems to be interested in Maleingreau." A second little coincidence had sealed a friendship. With that our correspondence grew more personal as well with talk about his wife Eloise, and illness, and aging. He was very sympathetic and supportive at my family's story of senior care, and the intellectual and physical changes brought on with age.

A major part of our conversations concerned organs. For two years, Noehren and I exchanged many words on organ design, organ building, and organ builders. I had made the analytical (but not malicious!) observation in my review of his Lyrichord recording that certain of the organs he built were idiosyncratic. My observation was based on experience. I had played a recital at St. John's Cathedral in Milwaukee where, in preparation, I had spent hours punching out registrations manually on the IBM data cards that comprised the combination action's memory. I had also remarked on the various subunison registers that played only to tenor C. Noehren graciously observed that "It was right for you to comment on the design of my organ in Milwaukee." He continued with a treatise on the economics of organ building, tight budgets, and resource maximization. It may have been a musician/instrument builder speaking, but it was also the voice of someone who had taught at a university and worked for the church!

Noehren tempered economic exigency with art. "I designed the organ [at St. John's Cathedral] always thinking how it was to be used musically." Saving the cost of the bottom twelve pipes of the Great 16¢ Principal on that 1965 organ allowed Noehren to add a string and some mutations to the specification. "If . . . you look at the music of Vierne, you will often see that the Gambe on the Great Organ is required in many pieces. . . . Look at most American organs. There is rarely a string on either the Great or Positiv (or Choir) organs. Indeed, there is usually an Unda Maris set. To be sure, a beautiful sound, but not very useful in much serious organ music." He questioned both his own tonal choices and those advocated by others. Robert Noehren had taken this critic earnestly, drew no offense from the opinions in print, and used the opportunity to engage in a dialog on the merits of respective tonal choices.

I later asked Noehren about Paul Hindemith, adding that my own conception of the organ sonatas was formed mainly through Noehren's recording of them. That prompted a meticulous response concerning Noehren's association with the composer. He outlined meeting Hindemith in Buffalo, where the composer lived after arriving in the United States before going to teach at Yale University, and where the organist played at a small Episcopal parish. Because Hindemith would sometimes visit the church, Noehren eventually got to know the composer well. They spent many hours together discussing interpretation and registration of the then only two sonatas, for Hindemith had just begun composing the third.

I had commented about the respective merits of romantic, colorist and dryer, abstract interpretations of the sonatas. In fact, I told Noehren that I had rebelled against my own teacher's insistence on an orchestral approach to these scores. That rebellion led to my  willful imitation of Noehren's old LP recording. He replied, "Like your teacher, I had been playing them in a rather romantic way, and I have to thank Hindemith for helping me with my musicianship during those early days. I still remember how dissatisfied he was with my performance of the last movement of the first sonata."

Noehren also voiced curiosity about instruments on which I had recorded and consulted. I had asked him about a couple of stoplists on which I was working and received immediate, candid, and helpful responses. At the time, the new organ at my own parish, the Church of the Ascension and Saint Agnes in Washington, was under construction by Orgues Létourneau. I had confided in Noehren that our hope was for an instrument reflecting English tonal heritage and had sent him specs and scalings. In the end, when I sent him a recording of one of the opening concerts, his approval overjoyed me.

What was most remarkable about Robert Noehren in his last few years was the zeal with which he still played the organ on a daily basis. He had been hard at work revisiting the Orgelbüchlein, a book he felt "appropriate at my stage of life." He had just been diagnosed with serious illness and seemed to find particular comfort in the brief movements. But, he acknowledged their musical difficulties. "I might feel a bit safer in the great G-minor fugue than in the prelude on 'Heut triumphieret Gottes Sohn' with that wicked pedal passage at the end!"

While he missed access to a good pipe organ near his home in San Diego, he did own a custom electronic organ, and his curiosity and aptitude with technology had led him to electronically revoice that instrument and add several MIDI sound modules to it. This fulfilled both his need to play on a daily basis and his ongoing instinct to build "better" organs. He was carefully apologetic, but not defensive about this instrument. "I fear that you might be one who believes we have been poisoned by the advent of the electronic organ!" But, he added, that this instrument "assuages some of my frustrations." As proof--extraordinary proof--he enclosed a cassette recording of some Bach, Karg-Elert, and the Roger-Ducasse Pastorale as recorded on his house organ. Of the dazzling and poetic performance of the latter piece, made when Noehren was in his late 80s, he commented, "it is perhaps the most difficult work I have ever encountered, and it has been a constant challenge. It is technically difficult and choosing and executing the registration is no easy task." Of the thousands of organ recordings in my collection, this one, performed by an octogenarian on an electronic organ in his living room and recorded on his little cassette machine, is the most prized.

Robert Noehren had also published a book of memoirs that I had reviewed, and some of the letters to me may have well been an elaboration or gloss on the book. At one point, Noehren sent a long list of all his teachers--piano, organ, theory, composition. This early 20th century Who's Who of our profession contained several names that interested me greatly.

One of these was Charles Courboin for, as a boy, I would sit in the choir loft at St. Patrick's Cathedral and watch Dr. Courboin play for the 11:30 "organ mass." In those pre-Vatican II years, the Cathedral maintained the tradition of a low mass (rendered mostly silently by the priest at the east end) accompanied by organ music (rendered not at all silently by the virtuoso at the west end). I would, on my own, take the bus and the subway and travel down to 5th Avenue on Sunday mornings in order to hear the Solemn Mass at 10 o'clock. I would always remain for Courboin's organ mass at 11:30. It was a splendid dessert to the sung mass. Courboin would graciously welcome me to the gallery and even ask me what I would like to hear. Courboin's phenomenal memory was legendary and I don't ever recall naming a piece of repertoire that he could not simply rattle off.

One of the reasons that Courboin fascinated us both was his atypical profile for an organist. He loved fast cars and boats. He was dashing and, in Noehren's terms, "could have been mistaken for a government ambassador." While a student at the Curtis Institute during the early 1930s, Noehren had coached with Courboin. One morning, Noehren and his friend Bob Cato, Lynnwood Farnam's favorite student, were walking downtown. They ran into Courboin. "He behaved at once as if we were his best friends and suggested we all have lunch at Wanamaker's. It was then about 11:00 o'clock, and he invited us to meet him at noon at the front of the store. When we finally entered the dining room it became apparent that the luncheon had turned into a big party in a private room with at least 15 people. All I can remember of the food is that for dessert there was a great flourish as the party was presented with a huge baked Alaska prepared for the occasion."

Robert Noehren also recalled his meetings with Fernando Germani (with whom he became friends and who introduced him to Italian food and garlic), André Marchal (who influenced him musically but was "distracted by the ladies," such that, in a meeting along with Marilyn Mason, Marchal paid no attention to Noehren), Gaston Dethier (who had the most formidable technique of anyone and whose pedaling was "really phenomenal" although he eventually no longer took the organ seriously), and Lynnwood Farnam (whose playing "simply put everyone I had ever heard in the shade"). These reflections were all the more vivid as several of these legendary performers were still active in my own youth. As Noehren put it about our swapped recollections, "what a difference a generation makes!"

How does one summarize the enormous range and analytical insights of Robert Noehren? It is difficult task to be certain. His musical life spanned East Coast and West, with a long stop in between. He could be, at once, a Classicist and a Romantic. He studied old music and old organs, built modern instruments capable of playing the old, and championed scores by composers of his own day. He was the recitalist who built instruments to overcome the defects he perceived in the instruments upon which he had to play. He studied with the legends of his youth and passed that tradition on to generations of fortunate students in one of the country's most important universities. He agglomerated seemingly far-flung and inconsistent concepts, all the while making sense of their synthesis. His world was expansive and never shrank, for his all-embracing curiosity disclosed an adroit mind that slowed little even in its ninth decade. Robert Noehren zealously coveted the truth--truth as discovered, revealed, debated, or developed in theory and creativity. He grappled with and reconciled art and technology decades before such would become commonplace. He generously communicated his remarkable journey to a large audience in his writing and teaching, and even to a grateful correspondent late in his days.

Can all of this, then, amount to anything less than the absolute and comprehensive definition of professional and personal intellect, art, and, above all, integrity? I would argue not. Integrity, furthermore, takes courage, the courage to pursue truth and to assert the convictions to which one's work leads. As such, Robert Noehren was nothing less than a genuine hero. I thank God for having had a moment to know him. Requiescat in pace.

--Haig Mardirosian

Robert Noehren bibliography in The Diapason

Robert Noehren is organist and choirmaster of St. John's Church, Buffalo. November 1940, p. 22.

Robert Noehren takes up new work in Grand Rapids. September 1942, p. 3.

"Organ Building an Art Not to be Limited by Definite Styles." February 1944, p. 12.

Robert Noehren leaves Grand Rapids for war duty. March 1944, p. 23.

Famed Dutch Organ Used in Broadcast by Robert Noehren. November 1948, p. 2.

"Poitiers Cathedral Has Famous Cliquot Organ Built in 1791." June 1949, pp. 28-29.

Noehren appointed to post in Ann Arbor. September 1949, p. 4.

"Historic Schnitger Organs Are Visited; 1949 Summer Study." December 1949, p. 10; January 1950, p. 10.

Bach recitals by Noehren in Ann Arbor and Buffalo. June 1950, p. 40.

"Famous Old Organs in Holland Disprove Popular Fallacies." March 1951, pp. 8-9.

"Organ Cases Objects of Beauty in Past and Return Is Advocated." June 1951, pp. 14-15.

Michigan "U" course reorganized to make all-around organist. November 1951, p. 38.

"Schnitger Organs That Still Survive Teach New Lessons." December 1951, p. 24.

Robert Noehren on fourth tour of recitals in Europe. September 1953, p. 17.

Robert Noehren is winner of prize for his recording. November 1953, p. 1.

Robert Noehren to play in Duesseldorf. June 1954, p. 1.

"Commends Opinions of Dr. Schweitzer to Organ Designers." February 1954, p. 22.

Robert Noehren is awarded doctorate. June 1957, p. 1.

"How do you rate? Test yourself on this final exam." July 1959, p. 16.

"Music Dictates Good 2-Manual Organ Design." September 1960, pp. 12-13.

Robert Noehren . . . Northwest regional convention. April 1961, p. 16.

Noehren to act as judge at Haarlem Competition. December 1962, p. 3

"The Relation of Organ Design to Organ Playing." December 1962, pp. 8, 42-43; January 1963, pp. 8, 36-37.

Robert Noehren to give dedicatory recital on the Schlicker organ at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. March 1963, p. 24.

"The Organ and Acoustics." March 1964, pp. 26-27.

"Architectural Acoustics as related to Church Music." November 1964, pp. 40-41.

"Taste, Technique and Tone." April 1965, p. 49.

"Schnitger, Cliquot and Cavaillé-Coll: Three Great Traditions and their Meaning to Contemporary Organ Playing." November 1966, pp. 40-41; December 1966, p. 28; January 1967, pp. 48-49; February 1967, pp. 44-45.

Robert Noehren appointed Rose Morgan Professor of Organ for the fall semester of 1975 at The University of of Kansas. September 1975, p. 18.

Robert Noehren, professor of organ at the University of Michigan, retired in January 1976. June 1976, p. 2.

Robert Noehren named professor emeritus. January 1977, p. 5.

Robert Noehren elected Performer of the Year by New York City AGO. May 1978, p. 19.

"Squire Haskin--a tribute." February 1986, p. 2.

"The discography repertoire of Robert Noehren." March 1990, pp. 12-13.

"Robert Noehren at 80: A Tribute." December 1990, pp. 12-14.

"Organ Design Based on Registration." December 1991, pp. 10-11.

"A Reply to the Tale of Mr. Willis." January 1997, p. 2.

Robert Noehren celebrates his 90th birthday. December 2000, p. 3.

"Enjoying Life at 90." September 2001, pp. 15-17.

"Reflections on Life as an Organist." December 2001, pp. 17-20.

 

Johann Sebastian Bach: Organ Works. Robert Noehren, Organist. Previous unreleased recordings from 1980 issued in celebration of Robert Noehren's ninetieth birthday. Noehren organs of The Cathedral of Saint John the Evangelist, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and The First Presbyterian Church, Buffalo, New York. Fleur de Lis FL 0101-2. Available from The Organ Historical Society, P.O. Box 26811, Richmond, VA 23261; 804/353-9226; $14.98 plus shipping;

.

Program: Fantasia and Fugue in G Minor, BWV 542; Wenn wir in höchsten Nöthen sein, BWV 668; Wo soll ich fliehen hin, BWV 646; Partita: O Gott, du frommer Gott, BWV 767; Partita: Sei gegrüsset, Jesu gütig, BWV 768; Fugue in G Major ("Gigue"), BWV 577; Prelude and Fugue in D Minor ("Violin"), BWV 539; Prelude and Fugue in A Minor, BWV 543.

This new issue, like the previous Robert Noehren Retrospective produced by Lyrichord (see this journal, December, 1999, p. 11), is the result of expert remastering by Hal Chaney of analog recordings done on tape many years ago. As in the CD mentioned above, this issue features organs designed and built by Robert Noehren.

For those who are familiar with Noehren's tasteful and flexible organ playing, this issue should come as a welcome addition to his already considerable discography. Noehren was never one to endorse or follow "trendy" or merely currently fashionable playing ideas; instead, he always makes the music come alive through thoughtful application of scholarship and study of the scores to determine both just the right tempos and appropriate registrations for convincing musical communication. These features are in abundance on this new issue.

Another important facet contributing to the pleasure of this CD is the fact that the same person is both the artist and the organ builder. His clearly articulated philosophy of organ tone (see An Organist's Reader, reviewed in this journal, September, 2000, p. 10) is demonstrated here all the way from gutsy and brilliant (but never strident) principal and reed choruses to subtle smaller ensembles and solo combinations appropriate to the musical requirements. One can imagine that Noehren was able to bring forth the very sounds that were in his "mind's ear" by performing on these two rather large instruments of his own design.

All the pieces except for the two chorale partitas are performed on the 1966 organ in the Cathedral of Saint John the Evangelist in Milwaukee, while the partitas show off the varied smaller ensembles and solo combinations of the instrument in The First Presbyterian Church, Buffalo, built in 1970. Both instruments are of similar size, with the Buffalo instrument (somewhat larger) notable by its frequently pictured hanging Positiv division.

Seasoned players and students alike will be inspired by the apparently effortless execution of the more demanding works and should take note of the way Noehren uses subtle rubato to point up the structure of the various forms. His elegant approach to trills and other ornaments reveal that the artist regards these items as integral parts of musical expression and not simply as whimsical and mechanical additions to the musical line.

Blessed with both an astounding playing technique and impeccable musical taste, Robert Noehren's playing as revealed on this CD should bring feelings of recognition to those who have head him in past years and should also serve as a revelation to the younger generation. Highly recommended.

--Ronald E. Dean

Centenary College

Shreveport, Louisiana

Current Issue