Harpsichord News

Larry Palmer is harpsichord editor of THE DIAPASON.

Facsimiles from Fuzeau: Sources for Lifelong Learning

Alternately fascinating and frustrating, facsimiles of original manuscripts and printed editions have become increasingly available. For the harpsichordist there is little that is more rewarding than playing from an actual musical “picture” as presented by the composer. Reading from the “original” certainly does not answer all questions, but it does give an unadulterated source as basis for making one’s own musical decisions. For this reason, I heartily recommend playing from facsimiles as a challenging, and often a cleansing, exercise in musical growth.

To utilize these recent scores from publisher Jean-Marc Fuzeau of France, it will help to have an adventurous spirit, as well as a willingness to learn the occasional unfamiliar clef, frequently used in earlier music manuscripts to avoid excessive employment of ledger lines.

Alessandro Poglietti: Rossignolo  [Collection Dominantes Number 5905].

Works for harpsichord or organ by the Italian composer who died in 1683 during his flight from Vienna following the Turkish siege of that city. Three main sources for these pieces are introduced by Peter Waldner, whose notes in French, English, and German include both biographical and bibliographical information and a listing of available modern editions. Fuzeau’s publication comprises three slim paperbound volumes in a folder: an autograph manuscript from the Austrian National Library, Vienna (Cod. 19248), an early edition from the Music Library of the Benedictine Monastery of Marienberg, Burgeis (60/q 366), and another copy of an old source, now housed in the Deutsche Staatsbibliothek, Berlin (Mus.ms. 17670). All utilize the soprano clef (notes written a third higher than the customary G clef) and the familiar bass clef on F. Individual pieces include a Toccata, Canzone, Allemande Amour, Courante, Sarban, Gigue, Ayre, as well as Il Rossignolo Capricio [sic] and a Petitte Ayre gay “in imitation of the Nightingale.”

Johann Kuhnau: Neue Clavier-übung, Partie I (1689) [Collection Dominantes Number 5716], consists of seven short keyboard suites in C, D, E, F, G, A, and B-flat, prefaced by eleven pages of introductory material by Philippe Lescat. Each group of pieces begins with a Prelude (the fourth suite, a Sonatina). The volume is engraved in a large, clear format employing the first line soprano clef and the familiar bass clef on F.

For a modern performing edition of these works (and others, including the popular and appealing Biblical Sonatas) by Bach’s immediate predecessor as Cantor of Leipzig’s  Thomaskirche, consult the beautifully-presented two-volume set of Kuhnau’s Collected Works for Keyboard edited by C. David Harris, available from The Broude Trust, New York (ISBN 0-8540-7660-4).

Christoph Graupner: Monatliche Clavir Früchte (1722) [Collection Dominantes Number 5855].

Not surprisingly, this collection of “Monthly Keyboard Fruits” comprises twelve groups of keyboard pieces illustrating the months of the year. (I suppose one could create a larger work--Seasons--by playing these suites in groups of three!) Graupner, student of and assistant to Kuhnau in Leipzig, spent most of his distinguished career in Darmstadt. Soprano and bass F clefs, notes by Oswald Bill.

Louis Marchand: Pièces de clavecin (Book I, 1699; Book II, 1702), Air (La Venitienne) [La Musique Française Classique Number 5761].

Book One contains a Suite in D minor, consisting of a (measured) prelude and eight dance movements (including an elegant Chaconne with four couplets) engraved primarily in soprano and third line F clefs (with occasional deviations to G and third line C clefs). Book Two contains a Suite in G minor, the prelude of which has some unmeasured passages. Seven short dance movements follow.

Edited by Thurston Dart, Marchand’s two suites were published by Editions L’Oiseau Lyre in 1960. Dart’s edition does not contain the short Air (printed by Ballard as the character piece “La Venitienne” [in Pièces Choisies pour le clavecin]), included in the facsimile (with easy-to-read G and F clefs). Introductory notes to Fuzeau’s publication include an essay on “French Harpsichord Makers of Marchand’s Time” by Philippe Lescat. An amusing attribution in his Bibliography replaces American harpsichord maker and instrument historian FRANK Hubbard’s first name with the more Gallic spelling FRANCK.

Christian Gottlob Neefe: Zwölf Klavier-Sonaten (1773) [Collection Dominantes Number 5880].

Twelve early classic works for clavichord by Beethoven’s teacher; published in Leipzig with a dedication to “Herr Kapellmeister [C P E] Bach in Hamburg.” The original print featured a clear, clean text (soprano, bass F clefs). The inevitable printer’s errors are noted and corrected in introductory material by Pascal Duc.

Number Twelve in the Fuzeau series Méthodes & Traités  fills two volumes, each containing more than 200 pages. Clavecin presents in chronological order selections from the most important French sources concerning the harpsichord. A reading knowledge of French would be helpful, but for those who are challenged by the language, a great amount of enjoyment may be gleaned from the generous offering of harpsichord-related images, easily-deciferable information, and the many musical examples.

Beginning with tuning and building information from Mersenne’s Harmonie universelle (1636) and Denis’ Traité de l’accord de l’espinette (1650), volume one continues with ornament tables found in the keyboard volumes by Chambonnières (1670), d’Anglebert (1689), Dieupart (1701: a volume dedicated to the Countess of Sandwich), Le Roux (1705), François Couperin (Book I, 1713), Dandrieu (1724), Dagincourt (1733), Michel Corrette (1734), Louis-Claude Daquin (1735), Rameau (1736), Van Helmont (1737), Jollage (1738), and Royer (1746), plus complete facsimiles of Saint-Lambert’s Les Principes du Clavecin, (1702) and Couperin’s L’art de toucher le clavecin (1717). [Consult the original layout of Couperin’s Troisième Prélude (page 175) to substantiate a correct reading of the never-corrected faulty first bass note at the beginning of the last score: the guide (guidon) from the preceding line shows it to be a “C,”  but the engraver actually notated a “B-flat,” creating a chord unidiomatic to an 18th-century piece.]

Also included are two documents including important information for stylistic performance of French keyboard music: a letter by Le Gallois concerning the playing of the prélude non mésurée (1680) and Rameau’s two-page commentary on proper touch at the harpsichord (1724), ending with his intriguing comment that the same techniques are applicable as well to the organ.

Volume Two continues this rich treasure trove with Michel Corrette’s Les Amusemens du Parnasse, a short and easy method for the harpsichord (1749). This includes a simple Suite in C for beginners, with fingerings provided AND utilizing the familiar G and F clefs, followed by an additional twelve pages of easy pieces. At the end of the volume Marpurg’s Art de toucher le clavecin (1797) gives a fin de siècle example of keyboard instruction, concluding with another lengthy set of easier pieces by Mr. Sorge, organist and mathematician of Lobenstein (once again using “modern” clefs).

Other gems reprinted in this second volume include composer Duphly’s handwritten remarks on fingering (1769) as preserved in the copy of his Pièces de clavecin, Book I, belonging to his student, English Lord Fitzwilliam; illustrations of harpsichord construction from Diderot’s Encyclopédie (1751- 1772); Lessons and Principles of Harmony by Bemetzrieder (1771) reproduced from a copy once owned by the important 19th-century musical reformer Choron; and several more enchanting engravings of variously styled harpsichords with other instruments from the Essai sur la musique ancienne et moderne by Laborde (1780).

For more complete details, including current prices, consult the publisher’s website: <classical-music.fuzeau.com>. A recent promotional offering, a miniature volume of selected pages from facsimile publications, is offered at this address. Let your discoveries begin!

Send news items or comments about Harpsichord News to Dr. Larry Palmer, Division of Music, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275;

<[email protected]>.

Wiesbaden, Leipzig, Paris: Breitkopf & Härtel, rev.

Dr. Leon W. Couch III, D.M.A., Ph.D., coordinates and teaches the music theory curriculum at Texas A&M University. Earlier as a graduate student, Couch maintained an organ studio and taught theory courses at the University of Cincinnati's College-Conservatory of Music. Later he served as an Adjunct Professor of Mathematics at the university. Dr. Couch's research interests are in historical music theory, Schenkerian analysis, and analysis of electronic music. He is currently investigating the role of musical rhetoric in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century German music. For three years, Couch also served as music director at Concordia Lutheran Church, Cincinnati, Ohio. He is currently music director and organist for Our Saviour's Lutheran Church in College Station, Texas.

Introduction and Purpose

The lack of autograph manuscripts and the haphazard transmission of Buxtehude's organ works through generations of questionable copyists has plagued Buxtehude scholarship since its inception. In many cases, the poor text found in surviving sources of Buxtehude's music makes it difficult for editors to produce successful Urtext editions for performance. In the late 1960s, Klaus Beckmann bravely diverged from orthodox editorial practice and asserted that he would attempt to recover Buxtehude's lost voice through inference and, occasionally, pure conjecture.1 Despite this controversial but necessary methodology, his 1971 edition of Buxtehude's organ works was rightly lauded by many as being thoroughly musical.  (See Table 1 for the list of common editions cited in this article.) Consequently, not only did his edition become the most popular edition for recent generations of organists, but his method was successfully employed by his competitor Christoph Albrecht in the recent Bärenreiter edition. With the performer in mind, the present article evaluates the first two volumes of Beckmann's 1997 edition of Buxtehude's complete organ works by comparing them to his earlier edition and to competing editions.

Brief Survey of Editions and Primary Sources

Beckmann attempted to remove the degradation of the musical text resulting from copyists who not only used a different musical notation than Buxtehude but were also removed from Buxtehude by region and one generation. In some cases, the scribe was simply inept or the surviving manuscripts clearly do not reflect Buxtehude's intentions. The eighteenth-century scribe of the Toccata in D Minor, BuxWV 155, for instance, not only misunderstood the meter and where to place barlines, he was also clearly confused by the North German organ tablature he was transcribing. This magnificent work exists only in this one corrupt manuscript. In examples such as Praeludium in A Major, BuxWV 151, multiple corrupt sources contradict each other or even provide extra passages.2

Under an Urtext model for editing, most editors in the past attempted to reliably transmit extant sources with an emphasis on the most recently discovered manuscripts.3 In 1876-78, Philipp Spitta drew primarily from two sources available to him, the Berlin Manuscript and the Andreas Bach Book. In 1939, Max Seiffert augmented Spitta's work with the recently discovered Lowell Mason Codex of 1684 ("Codex E. B. 1688") and the Schmahl Tablature. Still using Spitta's work as a basis, Joseph Hedar depended heavily upon the Lindemann and Engelhart Tablatures recently found in the Lund University library for his 1950 and 1952 edition.

More recent editions (after 1970) have attempted to approach all the available sources with more circumspection. But in his 1971 edition, Beckmann not only reevaluated the extant primary sources and conflated musical passages from multiple sources further than his predecessors, he took the revolutionary step of examining the musical context ("internal textual criticism") to figure out what Buxtehude might have meant to say (his "ipsissima vox").4    Albrecht's 1994-95 edition embraces Beckmann's methods, but often with different musical results. In contrast to these recent approaches aimed towards a performable score, Michael Belotti chose the least corrupt source (in his opinion) and essentially marked all other sources as variants in his recent 1998 edition. Unlike Albrecht's and Beckmann's editions, Belotti's does not present an amalgamation of sources that attempts to find Buxtehude's real voice.

In summary, nearly every edition emphasizes different sources, and the recent editions present opposing but equally legitimate approaches: Belotti's volumes allow a scholar to reconstruct any of the sources with the help of his extensive (and easy to read!) critical notes; in contrast, Albrecht and Beckmann both present convincing interpretations that a performer can simply play without being forced into score study. Because the older and the newer editions represent different sources or approaches, I must say that they all still deserve consideration when seriously studying particular works.

Beckmann's First Edition (1971): The Criticisms

Several criticisms of Beckmann's 1971 edition motivated the publication of his 1997 revision. The primary objection to the original edition was that the critical notes were only located in the scholarly volumes (EB 6621-22) intended for scholars and libraries, whereas performers generally elected to buy the relatively inexpensive performance edition (EB 6661-62). Because few bought the expensive scholarly edition, it quickly fell out of print and became essentially inaccessible. Thus, performers who used Beckmann's scores were entirely dependent upon his good musical judgement.

Furthermore, the conveniently "clean" appearance of 1971 scores gives the performer a false sense of security over the notes and musical issues. Alternative readings, suggestive indications in the primary sources, and labels marking Beckmann's inferences were not on the scores, and thus the performer is kept in the dark concerning these issues. One could not know, for instance, whether ties on repeated notes were authentic or editorial. One had to guess whether directions in manuscripts or the editor's preference determined the assignment of bass lines to the pedal or manuals. Without editorial marks, even a determined organist might not be able to discover what was original to relevant manuscripts and what was purely Beckmann's.

Although most organ scholars now agree that Beckmann's methods are necessary for the performance of many late seventeenth-century organ works, any attempt to reconstruct Buxtehude's desires obviously invites disagreements over particular interpretations. The use of pedal can be contested throughout the repertory. The most frequent criticism is Beckmann's handling of the opening keyboard figuration in the Praeludium in G Minor, BuxWV 149, in which Beckmann's groupings do not resemble those found in any source.5 (And, one of the sources suggests a more exhilarating effect.) The Toccata in D Minor, BuxWV 155, provides another common point of disagreement, because the manuscript source requires extensive editorial reconstruction--or "resurrection" as one reviewer put it. For this reason, reviewers often use this toccata to test an editor's merit.6 In the case of the Praeludium in E Minor, BuxWV 142, two sources dramatically disagree at the juncture between the last two sections.7 The quirky countersubject of the first fugue in the Praeludium in C Major, BuxWV 136, seemingly defies a consistent solution.8 When comparing the two editions, one need only spend a little effort to find many shorter instances of some import, such as striking chords and registers being normalized or inferred.9 Although alternatives to Beckmann's solutions may be better in several cases, Beckmann's 1971 interpretations are, for the most part, justifiable, musical, and convincing.10 (Alternative solutions found in other editions and in recordings can often be justified as well.) For this reason, I believe Beckmann preserved the spirit of most interpretations from 1971 in his 1997 edition.

Beckmann's Revised Edition (1997): The Preface, Critical Notes, Bibliography, and Sources

The revised edition features a more in-depth preface, a bibliography, and critical notes in addition to the scores of Buxtehude's free organ works. Beckmann's serviceable preface, despite its awkward translation, defends his goals and several of his editorial choices (more on this later)--its language and content seem aimed more towards scholars than performers using his edition. The bibliography is a wonderful addition: in one concise page, Beckmann compiles a list of recent seminal articles, along with significant editions and books. Beckmann corrected the most prominent flaw of the 1971 edition by appending the critical notes. As usual, critical notes will be a dense list of cryptic abbreviations and German phrases to the uninitiated. Although musicologists immediately feel at home, I suspect only determined, scholarly minded organists will use them. (Other editions, incidentally, do provide more accessible prefaces and critical notes.11) With the addition of these three features (preface, bibliography, and critical notes), Beckmann has responded to scholars' chief criticisms.

In addition to discussing some noticeable changes in editorial procedures (more on this later), Beckmann reiterates the modern issue over genre names in his preface: titles such as "Toccata" or "Praeludium" that can be found in the manuscript sources are preferred over the misleading anachronistic labels such as "Prelude and Fugue" found in older editions. Beckmann presses this point further than most by avoiding the inclusion of key centers in titles. The well-known Praeludium in E Major is simply "Praeludium" and indistinguishable by title from any others. Fortunately, this is not a major inconvenience, because key signatures can be read quickly, and the table of contents does list the modern keys (carefully separated from the titles). The order of pieces by BuxWV number (i.e., by key center!) in the first volume also makes the pedaliter praeludia easy to locate. The second volume, which contains the non-pedaliter and a few pedaliter free works, preserves the seemingly haphazard ordering of works in the BuxWV. One would need to memorize the BuxWV numbers to avoid constantly referring to the table of contents. Worse yet, the rough division of pedaliter and manualiter works found in the BuxWV and reflected in distribution of works in the two volumes may make Beckmann's edition potentially misleading.12 Except for BuxWV 162, in which an early eighteenth-century scribe indicated manuals only in the title, organists today may often choose whether to use pedals.

According to Beckmann, the 1997 revision reportedly benefits from recent scholarship (after 1971). Beckmann also points out that Albrecht's 1995 edition does not incorporate this scholarship, but in an addendum to his second edition (1997), Albrecht discounts the importance to his edition.13 (Three articles from the mid-1980s and the 1990s only argue that one manuscript source is derived from another one.)

Several new entries were added to the list of sources consulted by both Albrecht and Beckmann since

Beckmann's 1971 edition;14 however, the interpretation of only four works was affected. The Praeludium in F-sharp Minor, BuxWV 146, experiences the largest change--all modern editions have switched to the recently discovered Werndt manuscript as a primary source. Beckmann 1997 also adds a late eighteenth-century secondary source beyond Albrecht's list of sources, but from what I can tell, its content of three pieces makes little difference to Beckmann's  interpretations. Belotti's edition, incidentally, surveys all these currently available sources. The additional sources discovered since 1971 affect only a handful of pieces.

Beckmann's Revised Edition (1997): The Scores

Although the layout of the 1997 edition is exactly the same as the 1971 one--measures and musical notes are placed in exactly the same physical location along with the convenient page turns that we remember--the scores now distinguish some types of editorial license. In the 1997 edition, for instance, Beckmann clarifies which ties are editorial (dotted bowed lines) and which are original to the sources (solid tie). Although I find the dotted lines focus my attention too heavily on Beckmann's consistently good judgement on this issue, other reviewers apparently feel this is a major improvement. The locations of ties, incidentally, rarely change between the old and new Beckmann editions. (An example can be found in mm. 96-100 of BuxWV 149, where the tenor now rearticulates notes.)

Critical performance directions found in the sources now appear in the score. In particular, performers can easily tell whether a source specifies pedals. Thereby organists can identify ambiguous situations and choose to adopt Beckmann's educated guesses or to play alternative solutions instead. In several instances, a different choice might not only be more effective, but also be much easier to execute.15 The danger of Beckmann's (and Albrecht's) continued use of a separate staff for the pedal part, however, is that players may forget to consider these alternatives.16

Although Beckmann directly warns that "the decision about how much of the bass part is to be attributed to the manual and the pedal must be taken even when the work is notated in three staves,"17 one wonders how many organ students really read and heed his caution. Even though a skilled organist should be able to rearrange the parts at sight, too many organists may be seduced into relying too heavily on Beckmann's choices, however reasonable, to justify the ease that three-staff notation provides to the editor. Beginners will undoubtedly play what is on the page. In the preface, Beckmann also defends himself against those who claim that two-staff notation is better on historical grounds: Most sources of Buxtehude's music, admittedly, use two-staff notation, but Buxtehude himself certainly used organ tablature and did not need to make this notational decision at all.

A number of editorial changes between the 1971 and 1997 publications involve subtle changes in musical notation: (1) In the old edition, Beckmann beams four eighth notes together in 4/4 meter. According to Beckmann, the new edition uses duplets instead in order to encourage a Baroque performance practice "microarticulation." Although this change makes little difference to me when I use the scores, at least one reviewer found this subtle difference objectionably dogmatic, especially in the case of the three-eighth-note upbeat.18 (See Examples 1a and 1b.) In faster tempos, the more prominent layer of articulation probably lies on strong beats as quadruplets of the older edition would suggest. (2) Beckmann chooses to emphasize the use of dots over ties to lengthen notes. He believes that Buxtehude preferred this notation, perhaps because it reflects the act of playing more closely: If a note is struck once, one note head (with a dot) is used, rather than two note heads (with a tie). Perhaps Beckmann's scores resemble the Baroque sources a little more closely, but, as a modern player, I find this archaic notation simply irritating in some passages--it has little, if any, effect upon performance. (See Examples 2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b.) (3) Like most sources, Beckmann's edition no longer supplies rests in empty bars, leaving numerous staves entirely empty. (If he omitted these empty staves, would he be able to decrease the number of page turns?) The 1971 edition, incidentally, used a small font size for editorially supplied rests, but most users probably didn't regard the difference. (4) Less significant details exhibit more consistency in notation, such as the addition of "6" above all the (controversial) sextuplets in BuxWV 149 and the breaking of a sixteenth-note beam in m. 152 of BuxWV 142. (Note that some notational changes do reflect significant changes, such as the changed incipit to BuxWV 142, which reflects the emphasis of an alternative source in the later edition.) In summary, the improved scores, once again, better approximate the original sources, but several notational improvements have little effect on the performer.

Although most players may generally find Beckmann's improvements somewhat subtle, the addition of pedal indications from the sources, altered stemming, or even ties in particular cases can make a great difference. Beckmann, for instance, works hard to reflect the voice-leading through stemming, and, in mm. 36-39 of BuxWV 143, the revised edition uses an additional change of register to untangle the confusion of counterpoint found in his 1971 edition. (See Examples 4a and 4b.) In a case where the reviewer Lawrence Archbold praises Albrecht's choice of a striking dominant seventh sonority in m. 8 of BuxWV 155 over Beckmann's 1971 "correction" to a major triad, Beckmann does revert to the dominant seventh that Spitta, Hedar, and Albrecht all read directly from the primary source.19 Such small but important differences are evident in numerous works, and, if one is familiar with the 1971 edition, one will notice a myriad of subtle changes in nearly every work.  (See Examples 5a and 5b.) The publication of a revision is justified.

Recommendations

For organists buying Buxtehude's works for the first time, both

Beckmann's and Albrecht's editions serve the purpose of a ready-made and relatively affordable interpretation excellently. Both are highly recommended. While I personally prefer Beckmann's familiar renditions, Albrecht's edition provides enough information both on the scores and in the critical notes to involve "the user whenever possible in the decision-making process [of what to play]."20 (For this reason, Albrecht's edition might not be the best for beginners, but for more scholarly oriented players.)

From the above discussion, it is obvious that most Buxtehude enthusiasts will want to own several different editions. I should also mention that Dover has reissued Spitta/Seiffert's work (originally published by Breitkopf & Härtel in 1939). The publication is so inexpensive that it may be worthwhile to have it on one's shelves to consult occasionally, because their fine editing clearly reflects the sources that were available in 1939. In my opinion, upgrading from Beckmann's 1971 to his 1997 edition is simply too expensive, despite the countless small improvements justifying the revision's printing--Beckmann's 1971 edition suffices for those who already own it (with the caveat that performers reference another score or access the separate critical notes). I would avoid the Hedar edition as a sole performing score--as in the case of Spitta's edition, organists would need to consult other editions too often. Yet, for those without financial constraints, the Hedar edition provides another interpretation worthy of consideration and is a useful reference tool on the Lund sources. This older edition, after all, marked an important milestone in Buxtehude scholarship. Because both the Spitta and Hedar editions derive so clearly from the sources, a comparison with modern performing editions will show how much Beckmann's procedures have changed our view of Buxtehude's music.

Avid fans of Buxtehude's music should own Belotti's fine reference edition to supplement their performing editions. It is the best companion for study of this music. The scholarly edition, however, is out of the price range of most students, and, if used as a sole source for performing, it requires organists to study pieces and sources before learning pieces--something that isn't appealing to everyone.21 Libraries should obviously own Belotti's reference edition, because performers and scholars will want to examine the easy-to-read details of all the "variants" in the extant sources. A good music library will want to offer several, if not all, the currently available editions, because each displays different merits. Such resources would truly allow organists to intelligently tailor their own convincing versions.

Without Buxtehude's autograph manuscripts, no definitive edition can exist. Whatever edition of Buxtehude's music one is using, one should consult the preface and critical notes. Albrecht's preface is particularly good in this regard, along with the alternative readings in the score itself. Belotti's provides for fascinating reading and surprising accessibility in a scholarly edition. I hope that, with this article, organists will be able to choose the editions that best fit their needs and that they will feel inspired to consult multiple editions when enjoying and performing Buxtehude's music.     n

Common Editions of Buxtehude Free Organ Works

Albrecht, Christoph, ed. Neue Ausgabe sämtlicher Orgelwerke. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1994-98. (Edition BA 8221-23)

Beckmann, Klaus, ed. Sämtliche Orgelwerke. Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1971-72. (Performer's edition EB 6661-62)

________. Sämtliche Orgelwerke. Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1971-72. ("Scholarly" edition EB 6621-22)

________. Sämtliche Orgelwerke. Revised New Edition. Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1997. (Edition 6661-62)

Belotti, Michael, ed. Dieterich Buxtehude:  The Collected Works, Volume 15 (Part 1 A & B Preludes, Toccatas and Ciaconas for Organ (pedaliter)). Kerala J. Snyder and Christoph Wolff, general editors. Williamstown, MA: The Broude Trust, 1998. (ISBN 0-8540-7515-2)

Hedar, Josef, ed. Sämtliche Orgelwerke. Kobenhavn: W. Hansen, 1952. (Edition 3921-22)

Spitta, Philipp. Organ Works (1875/1939). Revised by Max Seiffert. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1952. Reprint edition. New York: Dover, 1988. (ISBN 0-486-25682-0)

In 2015 there are several composers whose anniversaries can be commemorated, albeit some of the dates are not known for certain; some of the names need no introduction but there are also several lesser-known names listed here whose compositions are well worth exploring. No claim is made for completeness and there is no guarantee that every edition is in print—there may well also be editions by other publishers.

Christopher Gibbons (1615–76).Eldest surviving son of Orlando Gibbons, he was organist of the Chapel Royal and Westminster Abbey; only a few compositions for keyboard survive in various manuscripts, comprising two short pieces (corrente and saraband) for harpsichord, four verses or voluntaries and three verses or double voluntaries (i.e. requiring two manuals for their execution), with passages for solos on Cornet, Sesquialtera, and Trumpet. Some versions of these double voluntaries seem to have been considerably amended and elongated by the scribe. All nine pieces have been re-edited by John Caldwell for American Institute of Musicology’s Corpus of Early Keyboard Music series (CEKM 18). 

Spiridionis a Monte Carmelo (1615–85). German organist, who traveled widely in Belgium, Germany, and Prague before taking a position in Bamberg in 1664. He composed sacred music and also published a two-volume keyboard tutor, Nova instructio pro pulsandis organis, spinettis, manuchordiis, in Bamberg, of which the first part, which appeared in 1670, contained a very large number of cadences, 35 canzonas, and 15 dances including corrente, and the second part, which appeared the following year, contains mainly cadenzas, as well as ten canzonettas, seven toccatinas, two gagliardas, and four corrente. Part three contains more formulas for cadentiae followed by ligaturae and trilli; part four contains the actuarium for parts one and two, an aria, allemanda, sarabanda, and modus variandi. A modern edition by Edoardo Bellotti of parts one and two has been published by Andromeda. Parts three and four have also been edited by Bellotti and published by Il Levante, obtainable via La Stanza della Musica, Rome (www.lastanzadellamusica.com).

Gregorio Strozzi (ca. 1615–after 1687). Organist in Naples and doctor in both civil and canon law, in addition to sacred works he left a Capricci da sonare cembali et organi, published in open score in Naples in 1687, which is indebted to Trabaci, Mayone, and Frescobaldi, its 31 pieces covering the main compositional genres of the time including three capriccios, three ricercatas, three sonatas, four toccatas, two balletti, three gagliardas, three sets of variations, eight correntes, a mascara, and a Toccata de passacagli. This important print has been re-edited by Barton Hudson for American Institute of Musicology in the Corpus of Early Keyboard Music series (CEKM 11).

Heinrich Bach (1615–92). Great uncle of Johann Sebastian and organist in Arnstadt, almost all of his compositions in various genres have unfortunately been lost. He was the father of Johann Christoph and Johann Michael Bach, who also became composers. For keyboard he left a Chaconne in A, edited by Laura Cerutti for Armelin, and two chorale preludes, on Erbarm dich mein and Da Jesu an dem Kreuze stund, included in Organ Works by the Bach Family, edited by Diethard Hellmann for Edition Peters.

Tarquinio Merula (ca. 1594–1665). Organist and violinist active mainly in Cremona, he published a number of sacred concertos, Mass and psalm settings, as well as madrigals and ensemble canzonas. Fourteen keyboard works have survived in manuscripts, including a chromatic Capriccio and Sonata, the former based on the chromatic tetrachord, the latter on a figure covering a major ninth by semitone (!), although many subsequent entries are limited to the tetrachord. There are three intonazioni cromatiche (which may well be incorrectly attributed), a toccata (which contains a fugal section sandwiched between sections akin to Merula’s toccatas but lacking his inventiveness), a capriccio with an insistent rhythmic figure and much sequential writing, and five canzonas, of which the first, an arrangement of his ensemble piece La Loda, has basic similarities to the capriccio, and the second is based on an intriguing sequence of four descending broken triads. The next three canzone have been attributed tentatively to Merula, no. 3 being a version of his ensemble Canzona La Marca. All of these pieces together with a cromatica by Soncino and a  canzona by Fasolo have been edited by Alan Curtis and published by L’Organo, Brescia, as Monumenti di Musica Italiana Series 1, Organo e Cembalo, vol. 1, available from Armelin. There is also a reprint by Kalmus, which lacks the introduction. 

Wolfgang Ebner (1612–1665). Organist of St. Stephen’s Cathedral, Vienna, and court organist, contemporary with Froberger. Three works certainly by him include three toccatas, a courante, a Capriccio sopra L’aria Pergamasco, the Partite sopra l’Aria Favorita with seven variations, and the 36 variations divided into three groups of 12 (the second and third groups being in the form of a courante and sarabande) on an Aria in A Minor composed by Ferdinand III. Works of uncertain authenticity include 56 versets encompassing various forms (i.e. toccata, capriccio, fugue in the eight church modes), eight of which are variants of pieces by Froberger and one by Frescobaldi, two preludes, a partita in A, and eight individual dance movements. Published by Bärenreiter in 2 volumes, edited by Siegbert Rampe, the publication also includes keyboard works by Georg Muffat. 

Nikolaus Bruhns (1665–97). Pupil of Buxtehude, he became organist in Husum in 1689. Comparatively well known to players today, particularly for his preludes in E minor, Bruhns was also a highly skilled violinist who, according to undoubtedly reliable contemporary accounts, accompanied his violin playing at the organ by a bass played with great dexterity on the pedals. None of his organ works were printed in his lifetime, and no autograph manuscripts have survived. His small opus survived in a virtually unbroken transmission in both manuscripts of the 18th century and printed editions from the 19th forward. He wrote chamber music, which regrettably has not survived, and 12 cantatas, and left four brilliant praeludia for organ in manuscripts—multi-sectional, and clearly showing the influence of his teacher as well as echo devices. A highly ornamented Chorale Fantasia on Nun komm der Heiden Heiland also shows continuation of the North German tradition of Scheidemann, Reincken, and Tunder. Modern editions, which also include an adagio and a praeludium, of which only fragments survive, have been prepared by Klaus Beckmann, published by Schott in the series Masters of the North German School vol. 13, and also edited by Harald Vogel for Breitkopf & Hartel.

Johann Hanff (1665–1712). Organist in Hamburg and Schleswig, only three of his cantatas and six chorale preludes survive in manuscripts. Five of the preludes are in a similar style to Buxtehude’s, with highly ornamented melodies in the right hand, but in Erbarm dich mein two verses are set, the second verse opening with a fugue based on the descending chromatic fourth before reverting to a right hand solo of the ornamented melody. They have been edited by Ewald Kooiman for Harmonia Uitgave, Incognita Organo Part 7. 

Johann Fischer (ca. 1665–1746). Kapellmeister to Ludwig Wilhelm of Baden, he published chamber and vocal music. His keyboard works include four sets of pieces, comprising two sets of suites for harpsichord/clavichord in 1696 and 1738, which show the French influence, and two sets of pieces for the organ, which show a more Italianate influence. Musikalischer Blumenstrauss of 1732 is a collection of pieces on the eight tones comprising a praeludium, six fugues, and finale for each tone. Ariadne Musica, of 1702 and 1715, contains 20 short preludes and fugues, each in a different key (including B, E-flat, and A-flat major, B, F#, and C# minor), which were known to J. S. Bach, who used some of the subjects in his Well-Tempered Clavier, and five ricercars on hymns for Advent, Christmas, Quadragesima, Passiontide, and Easter. 

The complete keyboard music has been edited by Ernst von Werra for Breitopf & Hartel. The Ariadne has been edited by Ernst Kaller for Schott as Liber Organi vol. 7 and the Musikalischer Blumenstrauss by Rudolph Walter for Musikverlag Alfred Coppenrath, Altötting as Süddeutsche Orgelmeister des Barock vol. 1, available through Carus Verlag. Facsimile editions have been published by Broude Bros in the Performers’ Facsimiles series nos. 197 (Ariadne) and 199 (Musikalischer Blumenstrauss). 

Johann Molter (1696–1765). German organist in Eisenach and Karlsruhe whose comprehensive works embrace all genres. Six chorale arrangements have been edited by Siegbert Rampe for Bärenreiter in German Organ and Keyboard Music from Bach’s Period.

Xarava y Bruna (ca. 1640–1715).Nephew of Pablo Bruna. Two pieces by him, an Ydea Vuena por a la mi re and fuga, and an Obra en lleno de 3 Tono (a tiento accidental found in the Jaca manuscript is a short version of the fuga), are to be found in one of the Martín y Coll manuscripts, and have been edited by Julian Sagasta for Union Musical Española in Tonos de Palacio y Canciones Communes vol. 2, and by Carlo Stella and Vittorio Vinay for Zanibon in Composizioni Inedite dal ‘Flores de Musica’ di Antonio Martin y Coll. 

Georg Wagenseil (1715–77). Organist and composer to the court in Vienna, he composed operas, chamber music, concerti, and organ and harpsichord music. Although considered as one of the most important Viennese composers of the 18th century, very few of his many keyboard works have been published, and conspicuous by their absence are the organ works, including 97 versets in various tones, a cycle of Praeambula and Versets on the Eight Tones, and numerous other individual pieces. Five pieces have been edited by Erich Benedikt and included in Viennese Organ Music from around 1750 published by Doblinger as DM1335 in the Diletto Musicale series, including a praeludium on the 1st and on the 2nd tones, a Fuga in D Minor, a piece titled Das Glockengeläut zu Rom dem Vatican (in C minor), and an Andante in D minor taken from the third Divertimento of opus 1, better perhaps suited to stringed keyboard instruments. 

James Nares (1715–83). Became organist of York Minster in 1735. In addition to much sacred music including services and secular vocal music, he left several publications for keyboard including two sets of lessons for harpsichord and a set of six fugues with introductory voluntaries for organ or harpsichord, which are available in a modern edition by Greg Lewin as well as in facsimile from Oxford University Press. Only nos. 1, 3, and 5 are preceded by an introduction. Also available in facsimile from Oxford University Press is Il Principio, or A Regular Introduction to Playing on the harpsichord or Organ, which gives basic information on ornamentation and fingering followed by a graduated series of pieces.

Georg Reichardt (1715–89). Pupil of Jakob Adlung. His Sechs fugierte Orgeltrios have been edited by Rudolph Walter for Hänssler Verlag and are available from Carus Verlag. 

Charles-Joseph van Helmont (1715–90). Organist in Brussels, he composed a large quantity of sacred vocal music including Masses and motets and a much smaller amount of secular vocal music. His keyboard works comprise the Pièces de clavecin of 1737, which include two suites, the pieces of which have French titles. The first suite and four fugues have been edited by J. Watelet and published by Vereniging voor Muziekgeschiedenis te Antwerpen in 1948 as Monumenta Musicae Belgicae vol. 6 (also contains pieces by Dieudonné Raick), with the second set edited by Laura Cerutti for Armelin, with a facsimile edition published by Anne Fuzeau. The complete set of Six Fugues has been edited by Jan Vanmol for Calcant.

Johann Doles (1715–97). Pupil of Bach in Leipzig, where he became Kantor, he composed much sacred and secular vocal music, harpsichord sonatas, and some chorale preludes, of which four pieces from the fifth volume of Singbare und leichte Choralvorspiele has been edited by Eberhard Hofmann for Musica Rinata in Orgelpräludien vom Barock zur Klassik. 

John Alcock Sr. (1715–1806). Organist at Lichfield Cathedral from 1750 until 1765, and thereafter at Sutton Coldfield and Tamworth, he composed sacred choral music, numerous secular vocal works, Six Suites of Easy Lessons and a Trumpet Tune for the harpsichord, which has been edited by Richard Jones and published by the Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music, as Easier Piano Pieces (vol. 15), and a set of Ten Voluntaries for the Organ or Harpsichord, a new edition of which has been edited and published by Greg Lewin.

Carlmann Kolb (1703–65). Organist of the community of Asbach and priest, he left a sinfonia for harpsichord and strings and the Certamen aonium published in 1733, a set of pieces on the eight tones, including a fairly expansive prelude, 3 fugal verses in a variety of styles and meters, and a toccata-like cadenza. Some of the preludes, particularly the third, are almost extravagantly eccentric in their modulations and dramatic rests. Modern editions by Rudolf Walter for Musikverlag Alfred Coppenrath, Altötting as Süddeutsche Orgelmeister des Barock vol. 5, available through Carus Verlag, and by Gregor Klaus for Willy Müller Süddeutscher Musikverlag, available from Bärenreiter.

Jose Ferrer (1745–1815). Organist in various Spanish cathedrals, including Oviedo, he composed mainly secular and chamber music. Seven sonatas for keyboard by him are preserved in a manuscript now in Zaragoza, and a further six have been attributed to him on stylistic grounds, although as no. 8 is by Domenico Scarlatti, it may well be that further pieces are by other composers. Many of the sonatas are far better suited to stringed keyboard instruments but nos. 9–11 sound well on the organ. All 13 sonatas have been edited as Sonatas para Clave by Dionisio Preciado and published by Real Musical, Madrid, as Teclado Espanol Siglo XVIII, vol. 1. No. 2 in G minor and a further Sonata in C Minor, both taken from MS 1665 at Montserrat, are included in Early Spanish keyboard music: an anthology—Vol. 3, The eighteenth century, edited by Barry Ife and Roy Truby for Oxford University Press.

Pietro Morandi (1745–1815). After studying with Padre Martini in Bologna he worked in Pergola and Senigallia cathedrals. He composed sacred and secular vocal and damatic music and also left 12 Concerti per L’Organo solo, with instructions for registration, and twenty sonatas and sinfonias, all of which have been edited in four volumes by Maurizio Machella for Armelin. 

Giuseppe Gherardeschi (1759–1815). Organist in Pistoia, first of S. Maria dell Umiltà and then the cathedral, he composed much sacred vocal music and several sonatas for harpsichord or fortepiano plus violin and also concerti. His numerous organ compositions, which include versetti, offertorios, elevazioni, sonatas, and rondos, contain precise instructions for registration, including drum pedals and toy stops such as the Uccello. Many have been edited by Umberto Pineschi in Musiche pistoiesi per organo (Biblioteca Classica dell’Organista, vol. M05 and M06), Antologia del Settecento organistico pistoiese (Biblioteca Classica dell’Organista, vol. 19), Musiche d’organo a Pistoia (Biblioteca Classica dell’Organista, vol. 30); Letteratura organistica toscana dal XVII al XIX secolo (Accademia di musica italiana per organo, Pistoia). Some twenty pieces have been edited by Maurizio Machella in two volumes for Armelin as L’organo Italiano nell’Ottocento (OIO 222 and OIO 223). An official download of Gherardeschi’s complete organ works, together with many other pieces from the Pistoia cathedral archives, is available from www.accademiagherardeschi.it/eng-partiture.php?id_sezione=6 for a payment of 10 Euros.

Domenico Puccini (1772–1815). organist in Lucca and grandfather of the famous opera composer, he composed both sacred and secular vocal music, as well as operas. He left 42 one-movement sonatas for organ in manuscripts, which have been edited in four volumes by Maurizio Machella for Armelin. A further volume contains sonatas for violin with accompaniment for organ or fortepiano. 

An increasing number of pieces, ranging from complete original publications/manuscripts (which present the usual problems of multiple clefs as well as original printer’s errors) to modern versions of complete or individual works, are to be found on various free download sites, most noticeably IMSLP; however, the accuracy of some modern typesettings is highly questionable, and all should be treated with caution before use. 

Publishers’ websites 

American Institute of Musicology—CEKM series:
www.corpusmusicae.com/cekm.htm&nbsp;

Armelin: www.armelin.it

Associated Board: shop.abrsm.org

Bärenreiter: www.baerenreiter.com  

Breitkopf & Hartel:  www.breitkopf.com  

Broude Bros: www.broude.us&nbsp;

Calcant: www.janvanmol.be&nbsp;

Carus Verlag: www.carus-verlag.com&nbsp;

Doblinger Verlag: www.doblinger-verlag.at

Fuzeau: www.editions-classique.com&nbsp;    

Greg Lewin Music: www.greglewin.co.uk

Monumenta Musicae Belgicae: www.dbnl.org&nbsp;

Musica Rinata: www.berliner-chormusik-verlag.de

OUP: ukcatalogue.oup.com/category/music.do 

Schott Music: www.schott-music.com&nbsp;

A Bach makes news

All Charges Dropped Against Singer Who Threatened Murder

My eyes were drawn to a news item from the Associated Press: "charges against heavy-metal singer Sebastian Bach will be dismissed if he avoids trouble for a year. The former lead singer for Skid Row, whose given name is Sebastian Bierk, was charged with terroristic threats and drug possession when apprehended during a bar fracas." (Reported in the Santa Fe New Mexican for July 27).

Bierk's brush with the law recalls an event in the life of "our" Sebastian Bach (as reported by various biographers, most recently Christoph Wolff, in Bach: The Learned Musician (pages 83-84): young JSB appeared before the Arnstadt Consistory on August 4, 1705, to complain about abusive treatment from a certain bassoonist named Geyersbach, with whom the composer had an altercation and street brawl. Bach's cousin Barbara Catharina witnessed the event, and her eyewitness testimony helped clear Bach of responsibility for initiating the incident, but the governing body suggested that perhaps he should have refrained from calling Geyersbach "a greenhorn bassoonist!"

Publications

Entrancing Muse: A Documented Biography of Francis Poulenc

Carl B. Schmidt's 2001 biography of the French composer is both complete and felicitously written. A chronological life story and details about Poulenc's works fill fourteen chapters. Extensive appendices include an explanatory "dramatis personae;" a complete listing of Poulenc's concerts, tours, and broadcasts; his recordings; and a "work-in-progress" list of drawings and portraits of the 20th-century master. (Pendragon Press: Lives in Music Series, number three; ISBN 1-57647-026-1).

The author's retelling of events surrounding the creation of Concert Champêtre for Harpsichord and Orchestra is comprehensive. To flesh out the words, two photos of the composer with Wanda Landowska (from the legacy of Momo Aldrich) are included. There is, however, a misprint in the dating of the photos. Momo's notation on the back of the pictures reads "Eté [19]28"--the season and year of mutual work on the piece (not the published 1918, at which time the composer had not yet met the pioneering harpsichordist).

Contemporary Music Review: volume 19 part 4; The Contemporary Harpsichord: A New Revival

Contemporary Music Review: volume 20 part 1; The Contemporary Harpsichord: New Perspectives

Two extensive and important paper- bound volumes published by Harwood Academic Publishers, edited by Jane Chapman, these books offer much information on the last century's development of the "modern" harpsichord. "A New Revival" comprises writings about compositions recorded on an accompanying compact disc (not sent with my copy). Among the articles are Annelie de Man's "Contemporary Music in the Netherlands;" "Points of Departure: An Interview with Simon Emmerson" (Jane Chapman); "Thoughts Before and After a Sonata"  (George Mowat-Brown and Helena Brown); "Déploration--In Memoriam Morton Feldman" (Brian Cherney, and in conversation with vivienne spiteri [sic]); "One Man's Noise Is Another Man's Music: The Demise of Pitch in Kevin Malone's Noise Reduction" (Pamela Nash); "Karyl Goeyvaerts' Litanie V for Harpsichord and Tape or Several Harpsichords" (Christine Wauters, Mark Delaere and Jef Lysens); and "Instrumentum Magnum" (Caroline Wilkins). Two gaffes noted in Chapman's introduction: "Challice" for "Challis" [p. 3]; and Howard Schott's name listed as "Henry" in her end notes [p. 6].

"New Perspectives" focuses more on the instrument's recent history: articles include "Harpsichord--a Mother of Necessity?" (Jukka Tiensuu); "Major 20th Century Composers and the Harpsichord" (Frances Bedford); "L'Interprète--La Memoire du Compositeur [The Performer--the Essence of the Composer]" (Elisabeth Chojnacka); "The Electroacoustic Harpsichord" (Simon Emmerson); "Notes Inégales in Contemporary Music" (Jane Chapman); "Ligeti's Harpsichord" (Ove Nordwall); "Brian Ferneyhough's Etudes ranscendantales" (Roger Redgate) together with an interview (Jane Chapman); "A Discussion of Overture to Orpheus with the composer Louis Andriessen" (Pamela Nash); "Lavender and New Lace: Sylvia Marlowe and the 20th-Century Harpsichord Repertoire" (Larry Palmer); and "The Harpsichord Works of Iannis Xenakis" (Ian Pace).

Early Keyboard Journal

Published under the editorship of Carol Henry Bates, this joint venture of the three early keyboard societies (Southeastern, Midwestern, and Western), Volume 19 (2001) is a veritable feast of valuable information for harpsichordists. Included are extensive articles by John R. Watson ("Instrument Restoration and the Scholarship Imperative"); David Chung ("Keyboard Arrangements and the Development of the Overture in French Harpsichord Music, 1670-1730"); the first part of an exhaustive catalog by R. Dean Anderson ("Extant Harpsichords Built or Rebuilt in France During the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries--An Overview and Annotated List"); and Cynthia Adams Hoover's report on the extremely successful exhibition PIANO 300 at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C., together with brief descriptions of its European counterparts in Leipzig, Nuremberg, Berlin, and Prague.

Another musical B

Franz Benda (1709-1786), Bohemian composer at the court of Frederick the Great, composed a duet Sonata in E-Flat, opus 6, for Madame la Contesse de Hueseler. This pleasant work in two movements (Allegro Vivo; Presto Scherzando) for keyboard, four-hands has been edited by Norman D. Rodger, from an undated print in the Library of Congress. The few errata in the original have been corrected with care by the editor. If played on the harpsichord, several thick passages may need to be thinned a bit (such as repeated thirds low in the bass at measure 4 of the second movement, or the string of successive octaves beginning in measure 20), but, in general, the work sounds well for our instrument, and is a pleasant, charming addition to the repertoire. The score is available from Good Pennyworth Press, P. O. Box 1004, Oak Park, IL 60304 (312/491-0465).

Moonspender joins murders with pluck

Thanks to reader Michael Loris, we list some musical references in Jonathan Gash's eleventh Lovejoy murder mystery, Moonspender (Penguin Books, 1988). The story includes mention of a Tallis madrigal, the Tantum Ergo, Purcell, Franz Listz [sic], organ, positiv, harmonium, Bach, Boehm flute, and, most welcome of all, harpsichord, which first appears on page 17: ". . .though I like her because she's bonny and plays the harpsichord for Les Moran's music shop in the High Street."

The big moment occurs on page 157: "Not many two-manual harpsichords play during working hours, so the music led me to Dorothy, my favorite witch . . . 'John Dowland?' I guessed. . . 'A pavan from his Lachrymae, Lovejoy. . .' Her instrument was a kit assembly, based on an early seventeenth century Flemish maker called Ruckers.  New, it costs half the price of a new car."

Keep those harpsichord and organ references coming our way, please.

Features and news items are welcome for these columns. Please address them to Dr. Larry Palmer, Division of Music, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275;<[email protected]>.

More than the notes

"Beyond Notation" was the well-chosen title for a conference presented at the University of Michigan, September 26-29, 2002. Sponsored by The Westfield Center and the University, the focus was on Mozart--ornaments, improvisation, cadenzas, Eingänge [introductory flourishes and "lead-ins" to the written harmonies] as essential, even compulsory, additions in the composer's keyboard music.

Robert Levin, Malcolm Bilson, Seth Carlin, Penelope Crawford, Pamela Ruiter-Feenstra, and Andrew Willis were the presenters. Through their lively and informative talks, as well as their expert playing, ideas for further study were encouraged. Small master classes and participation by the auditors, a welcome feature, afforded an opportunity to put these ideas into immediate practice.

May this conference be the first of many investigations "Beyond the Notes."

--Virginia Pleasants

Part 1 was published in the May 1996 issue of THE DIAPASON, pp. 10-13.

The Introduction of Organ Voluntaries: The Organist as Solo Performer

Despite the emphasis on the organist as an accompanist in
the first half of the nineteenth century, the playing of voluntaries did not
suddenly commence in 1850.  The use
of voluntaries became common in some churches after about 1810, although in
other churches (particularly those in rural locations) voluntaries were not
played until much later in the century. In 1835, Musical Magazine in New York
City published an article complaining about abuses in voluntary playing, which
contained the following comments on the problem of inappropriateness:

Every real proficient on the organ, knows that voluntaries
upon that noble instrument, ought to consist of broken passages, scattered
chords, etc., etc., which will not seize upon the attention of the listener but
rather soothe his mind, into calm collected meditation. Any thing like a
regular air would here be out of place. Even the learned harmonies of the
Germans, impressive and beautiful as they are, prove for the most part too
spirit-stirring, in their influence, for American voluntaries. Some of our
organists, however, have but little invention, and others but little taste. So
when they should either be silent or be endeavoring merely to soothe the
worshipers into devout meditation, they rouse them by a march, an overture, a
sonata, or a thundering chorus. . . . Such abuses, if tolerated, will bring
voluntaries into disrepute; if not lead to the expulsion of the organ from our
churches.57

Orpha Ochse adds wryly that if the situation was so bad in
the cultural and intellectual climate of New York City, one could only imagine
what sorts of things the untutored village organists were playing for
voluntaries.58

The common complaint of too much showmanship, which had been
levelled at the performance of interludes, was also carried over to
voluntaries. For example, Jane Rasmussen notes that Episcopal churches were
often the first in an area to get an organ, and whenever possible they would then hire a competent organist from Europe, New York, or Philadelphia. The organists often played virtuosic voluntaries as a form of advertising in order to attract students to supplement their church salaries.59 Whether justified or not, this virtuosity was generally considered distracting to the tone of the
service.  In non-Episcopal (or less
wealthy) churches, this problem would probably have occurred somewhat later in
the century due to the later technical development of native players, but it
became a problem nonetheless.

Charles Zeuner

Prior to the publication of Zeuner's collections of organ
voluntaries, most organists who played voluntaries improvised them.
style="mso-spacerun: yes">  Zeuner presented an alternative for
those who did not yet possess this skill. Zeuner's Voluntaries for the Organ, published in 1830, was the first collection of organ music published in the United States, and consists of six voluntaries.60 Although the use of the term "voluntary" and his designation of the pieces as "Before Service" or "After Service" suggests that he intended the pieces for church use, Zeuner indicated on the score that the pieces were "composed and dedicated to the Handel and Haydn Society, Boston,"61 a secular musical society. However, his second organ publication, Organ Voluntaries, published in 1840, is clearly a volume for the church organist. This is a longer and more comprehensive work than his first collection, and consists of two parts. The first part involves 165 interludes and short preludes in a variety of keys (to be used with hymns). Part II contains "Practical Voluntaries to be used before and after services in churches," with intended uses specified for each piece.62
style="mso-spacerun: yes">  These voluntaries have no pedal parts,
and contain dynamic markings but only minimal registration indications. This
collection forms a sort of bridge between the earlier "methods" and
the forthcoming collections of music with instructive introductions: it is the
first comprehensive printed collection for church use of interludes and (more
importantly) voluntaries, which were becoming the new focus of most organists,
but it does not yet include any of the descriptions and admonishments for
performing them that the later collections include.

The opposite situation occurs in an article from The
American Journal of Music, published in Boston on February 25, 1845, and
entitled "On the Use of the Stops of the Organ."63 The anonymous
author explains that although the organ is the instrument best suited for
extemporizing (voluntaries in church), he has never seen any "practical
treatises" on this subject. Therefore, he provides stylistic and
registration suggestions for voluntary playing. In contrast to Zeuner, this
instructional treatise is all text and no music.

Thomas Loud

Thomas Loud's organ method with its extraordinarily lengthy
title, discussed briefly in the first of this series of articles, was also
published in 1845.64   As the
title suggests, The Organ Study: Being an Introduction to the Practice of the Organ; together with a collection of Voluntaries, Preludes, and Interludes, original and selected; a Model of a Church Service; Explanations of the Stops and their Combinations; Studies for the Instrument; and Examples of Modulation intended to aid the Extempore Student; accompanied by an Engraving and description of the Mechanical construction of the Organ begins with explanations of organ basics important to Loud. These include descriptions of the basic organ mechanisms and stops, as well as practical matters such as beginning and releasing chords (Loud recommends rolling the notes individually from the bottom until all notes are sounding) and playing shakes. Significantly, he uses this material to lead into pointers on accompanying, illustrated in his model service for the Episcopal Church, before turning his attention to playing voluntaries. He does include two sample voluntaries in his "model service":  an introductory voluntary (shown in Example 1) and a voluntary for before the second psalm or hymn (in other words, an offertory). These voluntaries are musically straightforward, with basic registrations provided. Both include trills (shakes), an ornament that Loud seemed to feel was absolutely essential to the church organist's success. While the first voluntary is manualiter, the second indicates that the organist is to play certain bass clef notes with the pedals. Loud, however, provides small notes at these spots for those organists whose instruments do not have pedalboards.

Loud follows his model service with many pages of hymn
preludes and interludes in a variety of major and minor keys before furnishing
15 pages of voluntaries for church use, composed by himself and a variety of
other composers (Rinck, Cross, Russell, etc.). He does include several
voluntaries which are transcriptions, principally of religious works by Haydn.
He avoids the popular music pitfalls decried earlier in this article; although
he does include one "Religious March" by Gluck, it is quite austere
in character. At the end of this section, Loud adds a page illustrating the
"fine effect" of embellishing the end of a voluntary with a simple
suspension, emphasizing again the modest nature of this music.

At the end of his method, Loud provides some interesting
directions showing how to produce registrations of increasing power on instruments varying in size from four stops to modest three- manual stoplists, as well as ways to achieve particular registrations "effects." This leads into his closing and quite notable conclusions on voluntary playing, with which he ends his method. His concern is that voluntaries be consistently used, but not abused:

The style of performing (voluntaries) on this instrument
should always be in accordance with the use made of it, as forming a part of
the service of the Sanctuary; nothing therefore, opposed to the sacredness of
the place, can with propriety be introduced: whatever may be the character of
the Stops made use of, the music should be chaste and solemn, and all the
variety of the instrument, should (in the hands of the efficient performer) be
made conducive to the same subject. . . . Voluntaries should as much as
possible be suited to the subject of the discourse or character of the service
. . . 65

Loud continues by explaining how specific divisions or stops
can help to achieve these lofty goals. He concludes by explaining how to play
"fancy voluntaries," which his text implies are improvised and
probably not for use in church. 
His final admonishment is still applicable for improvisers today: "
. . . above all, remember to stop in time--a common fault with performers is,
that they never know when they have done enough."66

Cutler & Johnson

Before returning to Johnson's important American Church
Organ Voluntaries (mentioned in the first
article), we will make a brief digression to examine another of Johnson's
publications. Johnson originally published the Voluntaries in 1852 under his
name.  When it was republished in
1856, H. S. Cutler's name was included as well (see Example 2 - portraits of
Johnson and Cutler). A discussion of Cutler and the reasons for his addition in
the second edition is beyond the scope of this article, but apparently his
contribution was minimal (it is thought that perhaps he penned the
"Remarks"). Whatever the case, Johnson had originally intended to
write a second book, apparently planned in conjunction with American
Church Organ Voluntaries, called Instructions in the Art of Playing Voluntaries and Interludes and of Composing Simple Music. This book was conceived as a combination of an organ method and harmony book. It is thought that it existed in draft form and that Johnson was using it to teach his organ students. Unfortunately for the history of organ pedagogy, it was never published.67

Instead, Johnson published in 1854 his Practical
Instructions in Harmony, upon the Pestalozzian or Inductive System; Teaching
Musical Composition, and the Art of Extemporizing Interludes and Voluntaries. This book was unique in organ "methods" published to this point in that it was directed at the more sophisticated music student.68 Basically, it is a book of music theory with practical keyboard exercises. It was probably intended as a successor to Johnson's popular Instructions in Thorough Base which had undergone at least six reprints by this time, testifying not only to the need for these types of materials but also to the growing technical sophistication of the organist.

Johnson's Practical Instructions, however, contains no
discussion concerning church voluntaries, but approaches them from a completely
technical standpoint. This is not the case in American Church Organ
Voluntaries. The volume opens with
"Remarks," wherein the editors comment that one should speak of an
"opening voluntary" rather than a "voluntary before the
service" (as Zeuner does), since this voluntary is a part of the service
and should arouse the proper feelings in the listener for the worship which
will follow. They waste no time in criticizing the commonplace habit of playing
popular music, including bits of opera, as voluntaries. They warn the organist
not to give in to popular opinion which supports this sort of music, even if
they are getting pressure from a wealthy person in the congregation who has
money but no taste, ending by saying that in such cases it is better to
"vacate your office and retain the good opinion of all whose good opinion
is worth having" rather than to give in to "depraved taste."69
In regard to voluntaries after the service, Cutler and Johnson admit that there
are differing opinions on the value of playing music while people are leaving. They justify this practice by saying that there is already unavoidable noise at the end of the service as people prepare to leave, and therefore playing
appropriate music while this is happening will remind people for as long as
possible that they are still in the House of God. "What more appropriate
monitor than the solemn Diapasons judiciously managed?"70 The
"Remarks" answer many of the contemporary complaints mentioned
earlier.

The complete pre-publication title of this anthology, Organ Voluntaries, a Complete Collection, adapted to American Church Service, and designed for the use of Inexperienced Organists who have not Progressed far Enough in Their Studies to be able to Play Extemporaneous Voluntaries (i.e., improvised), indicates Johnson's purpose in compiling this collection--providing music for amateur organists. The voluntaries are all manualiter. Numbers 1-35 are opening voluntaries, while numbers 36-41 are opening voluntaries for use on festival occasions. Twelve closing voluntaries are included. Many of the voluntaries are by either Johnson or Cutler, but works by Haydn, Muller, Rinck, and Mendelssohn are included, as well as works by lesser-known composers of that period. The pieces contain some tempo, dynamic, and keyboard indications. The tempi vary, although in both the opening and closing voluntaries the majority of tempi designations provided are moderate. The voluntaries are one to two pages in length and generally homophonic in style. There are only isolated indications of sections with solo stops, marked in tiny print "solo . . . solo ends" (see Example 3 for the first half of an opening voluntary with these frugal registration markings). Thus there is nothing about these pieces which would relate them to popular music. Pinel suggests in the Foreword to the edition that although these pieces seem very plain to our contemporary ears, they would have been harmonically innovative, even "exhilarating," to mid-19th century rural listeners.71 (The harmony, while hardly daring, is more chromatic than that of the average hymns and service music.) One reason for the lack of excess in these pieces (and those in Loud's method) may have been the fact that Protestants were still strongly affected by the recent appearance of organs and conservative views of the appropriateness of instrumental music in
general.72 

The several printings of American Church Organ
Voluntaries testify to its popularity.
Gould comments that in his travels he did visit some congregations where the
voluntaries were appropriate and therefore useful (although he had many
negative experiences as well). Thus, Johnson and Cutler's music or at least the
approach to service-playing which it and Loud exemplified was represented in
practice and was not just a theoretical goal.

Southard & Whiting

Although organ methods from the Continent, American
materials for playing the harmonium or cabinet organ, and other unannotated
volumes of voluntaries appeared after Johnson's anthology, the next significant
collection was that of L. H. Southard and G. E. Whiting, entitled The Organist (1868). This volume is also an anthology of music for service use, with an introduction discussing registration and other useful information for the church organist. However, as will soon become evident, there are many
differences between this collection and that of Cutler and Johnson, despite the
similarity of their subjects and their separation in publication by only 16
years.

In the second half of the 19th century, one can observe the
rise of concert organs and concert organists. Large organs were built at
Tremont Temple in Boston (1853) and the Boston Music Hall (1863). The
increasing popularity and professionalism of orchestras fueled the popularity
of orchestral transcriptions for organ. 
Organists adopted some of the Romantic excesses of European organists,
such as the fascination in trying to recreate "storms" on the organ.
It is noteworthy that the first piece performed on the new Walcker organ in
Boston's Music Hall was the "Overture to William Tell" by Rossini.73
At the same time, the technical improvements and expanded size of organs made
it more practical to perform legitimate organ literature of greater magnitude
than the voluntaries.  The
dedication recitals of organs in churches now were devoted exclusively to organ
solos, whereas previously these events consisted of vocal solos accompanied by
organ with perhaps a few organ voluntaries.74 Several sources mention that Bach
organ works were performed in America for the first time in this period (about
the mid 1860s). Most of the concert organists, however, were English or
European.

In examining The Organist, these changes in organ literature in the second half of the 19th century are reflected.  The subtitle of the volume indicates that it is "a collection of voluntaries, studies, and transcriptions of moderate difficulty," and includes information on registration (which will be explored shortly).  The editors explain in the introduction that "melodious and piquant Voluntaries" are part of the church organist's responsibilities, and that therefore the aim of this volume is to supply opening and closing voluntaries which meet these requirements, complete with registrations.75 Like the Cutler and Johnson volume, this collection was apparently intended primarily for less experienced players who were not yet adept enough to improvise appropriate service music.  It is interesting that, unlike Johnson who taught improvisation based on models of Bach, Southard and Whiting refer the aspiring church improviser to the piano sonatas of Mozart and Haydn as a basis of study, pointing already to a sharp difference in outlook.

The music supplied for opening and closing voluntaries by
Southard and Whiting differs markedly from that of Cutler and Johnson. Even the
titles underscore this difference: although the term "voluntary" is
used in the introduction, the pieces are entitled "Prelude" and
"Postlude" (or "Postludium"--see Example 4). This implies a
slightly different function than the term "opening voluntary" which
Johnson carefully chooses (probably something closer  "voluntary before the service"). In addition,
several of the pieces have titles like "Reverie" or
"Romanza," reflecting a strong Romantic secular influence. The pieces
are much longer than those in American Church Organ Voluntaries
style='font-style:normal'>, and all include pedal parts on separate staves.
Three of the pieces are identified as transcriptions of Haydn, Mendelssohn, and
Mozart. The pieces are very pianistic technically, and include a multitude of
interpretive marks, including articulation, phrasing, and many dynamic
markings. Big chords alternate with solo passages, with all sorts of pianistic
accompaniment figures; one prelude even has a cadenza (#4), and piece #5, a
"Pastorale," contains running scale passages in 32nd notes. The
Postludes are all loud pieces, but the style of the Preludes varies widely, and
one is not always sure which category the pieces with other titles fall
into.  There is even a
"March," one of the styles specifically attacked by church music
critics of the previous generation.

It is interesting that the final piece in The Organist is Bach's "Celebrated Prelude and Fugue in e minor" (BWV 533), as edited by Mendelssohn. This seems to be a direct reflection of the apparently successful introduction of Bach into the concert organ repertoire at this time. It also suggests that organists were no longer expected to be able to distinguish sacred music from secular or concert repertoire, since both were equally acceptable in church. Apparently the responsibility of the organist to musically interpret the text and mood of the hymns and scriptures which had been emphasized earlier in the century was no longer a principal focus.

One of the most conspicuous differences between the two
organ anthologies, however, is in the treatment of organ registration. Here a
brief digression is necessary to survey the changes which had taken place in
organ construction between the writing of these two volumes. Although Americans
had begun building their own instruments instead of importing them from England
in the first half of the 19th century, the English influence remained very
strong.  By 1850, although loud
organs (by early standards) were increasing in popularity, the basic sound was
light and bright, emphasizing the diapasons and flutes, with some reeds and
strings included.  The manuals and
pedalboards were not standardized--both the Pedal and Swell divisions tended to
have incomplete ranges.76 The first large American organ was the Hook and
Hastings instrument installed in the Tremont Temple, Boston in 1853, with four
manuals and 70 stops.77 Thus, from about 1860 on, the enthusiasm for
increasingly louder organs continued, with a bolder, brighter sound appearing.
Console controls and nuances of the expression pedals became more important.
Organs now tended to be placed in the front of the church rather than hidden in
the balconies, and cases were often eliminated.78

These changes say a lot about the change in the role of the
organ in the church service. Around 1841, one writer complained that the organs
were sometimes unsuited for leading congregational singing, one of the possible
problems being that they were too small to really lead the singers and keep
them on pitch.79 However, by about 1850, Gould writes that performances were
gradually getting louder, complaining that in some churches the choir and
congregation combined could not sing above the organ, satisfying only those
"who are more pleased with noise than with sense."80 Johnson and
Cutler warn the organist about playing too loudly while accompanying in their
opening remarks, explaining that the organ should be subordinate to the
singers.81 However, it is interesting that in The Organist
style='font-style:normal'>, although the organs by this time must certainly
have been louder, this warning is never mentioned.

To return now to the topic of registration, both volumes
include information on registration in their introductions, as well as sample
specifications. (See Example 5 for the basic specification list from the Cutler
& Johnson collection.) As might be expected from the changes in organ
building, a much wider variety of stops is mentioned in the later volume. Both
collections describe stops, but Johnson and Cutler add information on the
purpose of some of these stops in worship.  For example, they recommend the diapason as "well
suited to church purposes in general," but guard against using the flute,
which "is a fancy stop, and generally much abused . . . when used as a
solo stop . . . the effect is suggestive of the theatre, or ball-room, rather
than the church."82 Within the pieces themselves, Johnson and Cutler
suggest only one specific stop in the entire volume, sometimes designating
where a solo stop should be used but not suggesting a particular stop. Southard
and Whiting, on the other hand, provide detailed registration suggestions at
the beginning and throughout every piece, as well as directions to use the
couplers, expression pedals, and tremulant. They also suggest in the
introduction that one of the responsibilities of the organist is to create
"striking and delicious effects of the organ," which they advise
requires the use of varied registrations and separate manuals.83

This emphasis on registration, coupled with the changes in
organs observed above, suggest that the role of the organist was changing by
about 1870. Although Johnson and Cutler provide basic material on registration
for the stops generally appearing on a "modern" organ, they are not
as concerned with how the organist applies or combines these stops as they are
with the spiritual effects that various stops induce.  Southard and Whiting, however, comment from the start that
"the chaotic droning and ridiculous combinations of stops which were
satisfying until within a few years, will no longer be endured by Congregations
of average musical culture."84 This implies a concern that the organist
have a greater technical knowledge of registration than was previously
considered satisfactory. But this comment also suggests that the organist is
now expected to start with the registration concepts of "musical
culture" of the society at large and apply them to the service of the
church, reflecting the increasing importance of musical culture in society in
general. This differs from the earlier outlook on registration which assumes
that the organist chooses stops based on their contribution to solemn worship
without regard for (or deliberately in contrast to) the types of sounds
associated with secular culture.

A final point of contention regarding registration is
illustrated in the closing comment of the introduction to The Organ
style='font-style:normal'>ist,
where the editors comment that they hope that their collection will "tend
to improve the taste and ability of players, and thereby create a general
demand for more complete and effective organs than are often found outside of
two or three of our largest cities."85 This is in marked contrast to
Cutler and Johnson, who, although they would agree with the goal of improving
the taste and ability of players, are trying to "improve" it in the
opposite direction from the goals of Southard and Whiting. It is noteworthy
that Gould writes in 1853 that organists should be careful that their playing
serves no other purpose than to recommend the organ and organ-builder86--what
Southard and Whiting seem to be suggesting as a positive goal.

It is interesting to note that in looking at the two
above-mentioned church music anthologies, there is scarcely any mention of
accompanying hymns and psalms. This may reflect the new rise of the use of
voluntaries and corresponding lack of suitable literature (thus the focus on
this aspect), or it may be considered a commentary on the relative lack of
importance of hymn-playing to these editors.  Southard and Whiting, for example, ignore the subject
altogether.

In studying the voluntaries in The Organ
style='font-style:normal'>ist, it
becomes apparent that some of the registration changes must have required
pistons, which as stated were becoming more popular. This makes the fact that
this volume excludes a discussion of registering hymns even more interesting,
since changes between verses of hymns to illustrate the meaning of the text
would now have been much easier and smoother. Perhaps due to the emphasis in
earlier years on accompanying, the editors were interested in looking ahead to new directions in church music.

Purcell postscripts

Now that the 300th anniversary of Henry Purcell's death has
been celebrated throughout 1995, one may reflect on what was gained by such a
commemoration. Obviously, increased opportunities to hear a wider selection of
music by England's greatest composer was a plus, as was the extended repertoire
found on some programs which included previously-unknown or underrated works by
his contemporaries John Blow, John Eccles, Pelham Humphrey, and G.B. Draghi.
Just as Wanda Landowska wrote concerning 
J.S. Bach, " . . . it is impossible to play and love Bach when one
has little knowledge of those he loved and played and with whom his works are
tied intimately . . . " (Restout and Hawkins, Landowska on Music, New
York, 1964, p. 84), so both understanding and respect for Purcell's
achievements are enhanced by familiarity with the music created around him by
other composers.

An abundance (one might even say, a surfeit) of books,
magazine articles, and recordings has given us expanded resources for further
study and enjoyment of the 17th-century English repertoire.

Among the books, one of the best is also one of the least
pretentious: Henry Purcell by Peter Holman (Oxford University Press, 1994;
available in a paperback edition). Six chapters fill 250 pages. Beginning with
an essay on Purcell's musical world, Holman continues with studies of Purcell's
works genre by genre--domestic vocal music, instrumental music, church music,
odes, and theatre music. The text is illustrated with a generous number of
musical examples. The latest manuscript discoveries and recent scholarship (as
of 1994) are noted in Holman's account.

One of these important recent discoveries was the
Purcell/Draghi manuscript of keyboard pieces auctioned at Sotheby's in 1994,
and now safely housed in the British Library (as reported in The Diapason for
June 1995). The entire manuscript, including its nine previously unknown
pieces, has been recorded by Davitt Moroney for a Virgin Veritas compact disc
(CDC 5 45166 2). Playing three historic instruments from the Cobbe Collection
housed at Hatchlands Park, Surrey (a virginal by John Players, 1664; a single
manual harpsichord by Andreas Ruckers, 1636, enlarged to a double by Henri
Hemsch, 1763; and a single-manual harpsichord attributed to Girolamo Zenti of
Viterbo, 1622) Moroney gives elegant life to the Suites in A minor, C major,
and miscellaneous pieces by Purcell, a prelude by Orlando Gibbons, and four
suites by Draghi.

Another disc which affords much pleasure is Sweeter Than
Roses, a Purcell song recital offered by American countertenor Drew Minter on
Harmonia Mundi 907035. With the collaboration of Paul O'Dette, archlute; Mitzi
Meyerson, harpsichord and organ; and Mary Springfels, viol, Minter offers
probing, loving, and beautiful performances of nineteen Purcell songs,
including such favorites as "I Attempt from Love's sickness to fly in
vain," "If Music be the food of love," "Hark the echoing
Air," "Music for a while," and the title song, "Sweeter
than Roses."

If one wants to try some of these pieces with a favorite
singer, an excellent resource from Oxford University Press is Thirty Purcell
Songs in two volumes (available in editions for high or medium voice), edited
by Timothy Roberts. All of the titles mentioned above (with the exception of
"Hark the echoing Air") plus "An Evening Hymn on a Ground,"
the movingly-expressive "Blessed Virgin's Expostulation" (a dramatic
cantata concerning the Virgin Mary's rapidly changing emotions at the
disappearance of the twelve-year-old Jesus before he is rediscovered in the
Temple), "Dear, pretty youth," "Lord, what is a man?"--and
twenty-two additional songs--are offered with stylistic, clean accompaniments,
realisations of the figured or unfigured basses which enable the keyboardist to
see the suggested harmonies at once, but which still allow room for tasteful
elaborations or deletions, should one choose to make them.

"Music in Purcell's London" is the theme explored
in the quarterly journal Early Music for November 1995 (Volume XXIII/4). The
cover, a reproduction of an anonymous oil painting from around 1700, shows the
interior of Westminster Abbey, including the only known representation of the organ
Purcell played (discussed in a short essay by Dominic Gwynn). Other articles of
interest include "Music on the Thames in Restoration London" (Julia
K. Wood); "Music for the Lord Mayor's Day in the Restoration"
(Michael Burden); "Manuscript Music in Purcell's London" (Robert
Thompson); "From Barnard to Purcell: the copying activities of Stephen
Bing" (Sarah Boyer and Jonathan Wainwright); and "Continuo lutes in
17th and 18th-century England" (Lynda Sayce). Eric Van Tassel reviews the
eleven compact discs comprising the complete sacred music of Purcell (Robert
King and the King's Consort, issued by Hyperion)--a unique and enduring
achievement of the anniversary celebration.

It has been announced that a new edition of Purcell's
keyboard music is in preparation from the Purcell Society. (I have not yet seen
a copy, but the volume is scheduled to include the "new pieces" from
the Purcell autograph manuscript, also to be issued in a facsimile printing.)
Of the presently-available publications, the best remains Howard Ferguson's
exemplary edition in two volumes for Stainer and Bell. The Eight Suites
(S&B 5598) and Miscellaneous Keyboard Pieces (S&B 5606) are presented
with Dr. Ferguson's usual good musical sense (and taste). His discussion of the
very real problem with Purcell's ornament signs remains convincing (for
example, the ornament table, printed posthumously in the 1696 edition of the
Suites, may not show the proper formula for the mordent [beat]). Having the
alternate readings from various divergent sources makes this an excellent
resource, should one wish to make informed choices amongst differing versions
of a piece.

The inexpensive Henry Purcell: Keyboard Works
style='font-style:normal'> from Dover publications is a reprinting of a 1918
edition from J. & W. Chester (London). There are many divergences from
Ferguson's later, preferred reading of the sources. The volume does include
several works not included in the Ferguson edition: especially lovely is the
Voluntary in G Major for organ (Z. 720)--an Italianate work reminiscent of a
Frescobaldi elevation toccata, filled with exquisite slow-moving harmonies and
pungent dissonances; and the spurious Toccata in A (Z. D229), at various times
attributed to Purcell and also published as a work by J. S. Bach in the
original Bach Gesellschaft edition of that master's compositions.

The Toccata, probably an anonymous north-German piece, is a
worthy edition to the harpsichord repertoire (by that ubiquitous composer,
"Anonymous"). It sounds even better if the following notes are
changed: m. 18 last note, sop c-sharp; m. 51 first note, sop g-sharp; m. 53
last note, beat 3 soprano e-sharp; m. 81, last note, sop e-sharp. I have found
it helpful to add various ties, just as one would do in other 17th-century
toccata-style pieces.